In section 19.5 of Peskin it is stated that if a scale transformation ##\varphi \rightarrow e^{-\sigma}\varphi(xe^{-\sigma})## is a symmetry of a theory then there is a current ##D^{\mu} = \Theta^{\mu\nu}x_{\nu}## (here ##\Theta^{\mu\nu}## is the Bellifante energy-momentum tensor) with ##\partial_{\mu}D^{\mu} = \Theta^{\mu}{}{}_{\mu}##.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Furthermore if one considers loop corrections, so that the coupling ##g## acquires an RG flow, then this will no longer be a symmetry of the theory and under ##g\rightarrow \sigma\beta(g)## the current satisfies ##\partial_{\mu}D^{\mu} = \sum_i \beta(g_i)\partial_{g_i} \mathcal{L}## as an operator equation, where ##\mathcal{L}## is the Lagrangian and ##\beta(g) = \Lambda \frac{d g}{d\Lambda}## is the usual beta function. However this claim is not proven and I have been trying for hours to prove this relation starting from the partition function ##\mathcal{Z} = \int \mathcal{D}\varphi e^{S}## and trying a calculation similar to the proof of the Ward identity, with no luck. I suspect my issue is I do not know how exactly the beta function is defined in terms of ##\mathcal{Z}## as opposed to its definition in terms of the RG flow.

Does anyone know of or have a reference for a calculation proving this claim? Thanks in advance!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Current conservation beta function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Current conservation beta | Date |
---|---|

Noether's theoem and conserved current arbitrariness | Apr 20, 2015 |

Gauge invariance and conserved current in SU(N) | Nov 13, 2013 |

Goldstone boson state, conserved current | Apr 23, 2013 |

Conserved currents in Mandl & Shaw (section 2.4) | Jun 6, 2011 |

Two complex fields + interaction, conserved current? | Dec 4, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**