Dark Energy: Supernovae Ia, Vacuum Energy & Quintessence

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pi.rootpi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark energy Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between dark energy, supernovae Ia, and quintessence in the context of cosmic expansion. Key evidence supporting dark energy includes data from supernovae, WMAP cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and cluster mass counts, which collectively estimate dark energy's fraction at approximately 74% of critical density. The equation of state for dark energy is suggested to be around -1, indicating a consistent pressure-energy density ratio. Unlike vacuum energy, quintessence is characterized as a dynamic field that can vary in both space and time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Supernovae Ia and their role in cosmic expansion
  • Familiarity with WMAP cosmic microwave background data
  • Knowledge of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO)
  • Concept of critical density in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dark energy on cosmic models
  • Explore the differences between vacuum energy and quintessence
  • Study the methods for measuring cosmic distances using supernovae
  • Investigate the latest findings on cluster mass counts and their significance
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the dynamics of dark energy and its implications for the universe's expansion.

pi.rootpi
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have another doubt :biggrin:

In addition to the Supernovae Ia, which more brought us to think the expansion was accelerating? And is there any difference between dark energy and quintessence? Because I've heard that dark energy is like vacuum energy (cosmological constant) and quintessence... I don't really know :-p

Thanks for all, since I'm in Physics Forums I've learned lots of healpful thigs!
 
Space news on Phys.org
There are 3 or 4 independent sets of data that support the dark energy interpretation. Here's a thread on a recent one
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=280456

It's a thread I set up in Cosmo forum in case anyone wanted to discuss the latest confirmation of dark energy----by counting clusters of galaxies of various masses, at near and medium distance (low and medium redshift).

A good way to answer your question is to go here,
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/12/16/dark-energy-no-longer-a-surprise/
and look at the figure of overlapping intersecting ovals. These show confidence bounds on two important Cosmology parameters----dark energy fraction (around 0.74) and dark energy equationofstate (around -1)

The four intersecting colored ovals are

Supernovae---yellow oval
WMAP cosmic microwave background data----blue oval
BAO baryon acoustic oscillation data-----green oval
cluster mass counts (the latest stuff)-----pink oval

combined---red blob where they intersect

You will see how each oval helps to narrow down the ranges on these two parameters. Those two numbers go into the cosmo models that give us estimates of other kinds of things that we can compare with observation.

In case anyone is unfamiliar. There is a welldefined energy density of 0.85 nanojoules per cubic meter, called critical density. The number 0.74 means that dark energy is estimated to be 74 percent of critical. That gives us a figure for it in nanojoules per cubic meter, if we want.
The equationofstate is just the ratio of the DE pressure to the DE energy density. As more data accumulates it seems increasingly likely that this ratio is -1.
 
Last edited:
pi.rootpi said:
And is there any difference between dark energy and quintessence? Because I've heard that dark energy is like vacuum energy (cosmological constant) and quintessence... I don't really know :-p

Unlike vacuum energy, quintessence is a new field that could vary in space and time. See

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1327486.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K