Dark matters seems unlikely to succeed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yu_wing_sin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on skepticism regarding the existence of dark matter, a theoretical substance proposed to explain gravitational effects in galaxies. Participants express doubts about the lack of observable evidence for dark matter, questioning its gravitational influence and the clarity of light from celestial bodies. Key points include the absence of detectable signs of dark matter's gravitational effects and the clear images of distant objects that should be distorted if dark matter were prevalent. The conversation highlights the need for alternative explanations and further investigation into the nature of dark matter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational lensing and its implications in astrophysics.
  • Familiarity with the concept of non-baryonic dark matter and its characteristics.
  • Knowledge of the LCDM model (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) and its significance in cosmology.
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics as they relate to particle physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gravitational lensing and its observational evidence in astronomy.
  • Explore the properties and candidates for non-baryonic dark matter, including supersymmetric particles.
  • Investigate alternative theories to dark matter, such as Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND).
  • Study the implications of the LCDM model on galaxy formation and cosmic structure.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology who are interested in the ongoing debate surrounding dark matter and its implications for our understanding of the universe.

  • #31
Kazza_765 said:
Sorry Yu, I don't have any contacts with nature or any other journal for that matter. I agree with El though, don't give up if you are passionate about physics. All of our theories seemed unusual when first proposed. And if you are wrong, then find out why you are wrong, learn more about the subject matter, and try again.

I appreciate to your friendly attitude, this is worthwhile for us to learn. I thank for your advice. I think my paper will get success, the matter is still in progress, when the time is came, my paper will get the echo of success. My paper's bosom friend is still carrying on the experiments. I am waited for it now. Thank for your encouragement.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Dear Yu.
Maybe you misunderstood my intension a bit.
I was not encouraging you to keep trying publishing you paper. I was encouraging you to start reading physics from the basics. If you do this you will after some time probably understand why your paper is rejected by everyone (and then you can make the changes needed, or you will find out that your idea was wrong).
The important thing is not that you believe in what you have written, the important thing is that what you have written is correct, or at least that there is a possibility it could be correct...
Due to your passion about physics I think you may be able to learn a lot if you just start from the basics and climb your way upwards, but let go of all that pseudo-physics.
If you want suggestions about what to start reading, this is the right place to be in!
 
  • #33
yu_wing_sin - Try publishing your ideas to our new Independent Research forum.

Information to be found here... https://www.physicsforums.com/for.../www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81172

In the spirit of the new guidelines, I'm closing up this discussion. I look forward to seeing your paper in the new forum.

thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K