Dark matters seems unlikely to succeed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yu_wing_sin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theory of dark matter and its implications for understanding the structure and behavior of galaxies. Participants express skepticism about the existence and effectiveness of dark matter in explaining gravitational phenomena in the cosmos, raising questions about its detection and the observable effects it should produce.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express doubts about the dark matter theory, questioning its ability to account for gravitational effects in galaxies and the lack of observable signs of dark matter's existence.
  • Concerns are raised about the expected gravitational effects of dark matter, with some arguing that if dark matter were prevalent, it should be detectable through interactions with other celestial bodies.
  • Participants discuss the phenomenon of gravitational lensing, with some asserting that it serves as evidence for dark matter, while others argue that such effects could be attributed to other forms of gravity.
  • There is a contention regarding the interaction of light with dark matter, with some participants suggesting that light should be refracted or obstructed by dark matter, while others clarify that dark matter does not interact significantly with light.
  • Some participants propose that alternative explanations or solutions may exist that could better account for the observed phenomena without invoking dark matter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of dark matter as a theory. Multiple competing views remain, with ongoing debate about its implications and the evidence supporting or contradicting its existence.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the current understanding of dark matter, including unresolved questions about its properties, interactions, and the implications of its supposed existence. There are also references to the challenges in detecting dark matter and the potential for alternative theories to explain gravitational phenomena.

  • #31
Kazza_765 said:
Sorry Yu, I don't have any contacts with nature or any other journal for that matter. I agree with El though, don't give up if you are passionate about physics. All of our theories seemed unusual when first proposed. And if you are wrong, then find out why you are wrong, learn more about the subject matter, and try again.

I appreciate to your friendly attitude, this is worthwhile for us to learn. I thank for your advice. I think my paper will get success, the matter is still in progress, when the time is came, my paper will get the echo of success. My paper's bosom friend is still carrying on the experiments. I am waited for it now. Thank for your encouragement.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Dear Yu.
Maybe you misunderstood my intension a bit.
I was not encouraging you to keep trying publishing you paper. I was encouraging you to start reading physics from the basics. If you do this you will after some time probably understand why your paper is rejected by everyone (and then you can make the changes needed, or you will find out that your idea was wrong).
The important thing is not that you believe in what you have written, the important thing is that what you have written is correct, or at least that there is a possibility it could be correct...
Due to your passion about physics I think you may be able to learn a lot if you just start from the basics and climb your way upwards, but let go of all that pseudo-physics.
If you want suggestions about what to start reading, this is the right place to be in!
 
  • #33
yu_wing_sin - Try publishing your ideas to our new Independent Research forum.

Information to be found here... https://www.physicsforums.com/for.../www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81172

In the spirit of the new guidelines, I'm closing up this discussion. I look forward to seeing your paper in the new forum.

thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Undergrad Dark matter + gravity is 'right', or our understanding of gravity is wrong?
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Undergrad Questions about Black Holes, Hawking Radiation, and Dark Matter
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Undergrad Could Dark Matter Be Stray Exoplanets or Collapsed Stars?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Undergrad How is Dark Matter distributed around our galaxy?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Undergrad Is Dark Matter Challenging Our Understanding of the Universe?
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Undergrad Which instruments are used to determine the composition of dark matter?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Does Dark Matter Fall into Black Holes?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Undergrad Dark Matter Disc Evidence: New Possibilities in Milky Way Galaxy
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad What does wobbling in BGC reveal about the nature of dark matter?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Undergrad Is there a consensus about the nature of dark matter?
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K