Darwin plagiarizes to Pierre Tremaux?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salia Narcovi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the claim that Charles Darwin may have plagiarized ideas from Pierre Tremaux's 1865 book, “Origine et transformations de l’homme et des autres êtres,” particularly regarding allopatric speciation. A scientific paper suggests that Tremaux's theories predate Darwin's work, specifically the 1866 revision of "Origin of Species." While Darwin had a copy of Tremaux's book in his library, the timeline of when he acquired it remains unclear. The conversation also touches on the contributions of Wagner and Gould/Eldridge to the topic of speciation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of allopatric speciation
  • Familiarity with Darwin's "Origin of Species" and its revisions
  • Knowledge of Pierre Tremaux's contributions to evolutionary theory
  • Basic grasp of the history of scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of allopatric speciation in detail
  • Examine the historical context of Darwin's "Origin of Species" revisions
  • Study Pierre Tremaux's theories and their impact on evolutionary biology
  • Explore the contributions of Wagner and Gould/Eldridge to modern evolutionary theory
USEFUL FOR

Historians of science, evolutionary biologists, and students interested in the development of speciation theories will benefit from this discussion.

Salia Narcovi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Darwin plagiarizes to Pierre Tremaux?


I leave you the link to scientific paper that it affirms that to the idea of allopatric speciation borrow of a book of Pierre Tremaux.


Trémaux on species: A theory of allopatric speciation (and punctuated equilibrium) before Wagner

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003806/


Tremaux's Book :“Origine et transformations de l’homme et des autres êtres, 1865″

http://fon.gs/tremaux-book-google/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Interesting paper, I don't know enough about the history of science to conclusively comment, although the paper doesn't argue for anything as definitive. The 1866 revision of Origin of Species came out a year after Tremaux's book in 1865 - while Darwin had a copy of it in his library, and apparently read it (based on a notation found in his copy), I don't see any information on *when* he acquired the book. Maybe he picked up a copy in 1867 after having been referred to it, and he didn't find anything new of interest.

Of course, it seems that Wagner and Gould/Eldridge also could have been used for the title of this post, but that's a separate discussion, I'd figure.
 

Similar threads

Replies
76
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K