Decoupled spin vectors A and B

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter filip97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin Vectors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 1K views
filip97
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Let we have ##J_i \in{J_1,J_2,J_3}## ,and ##K_i \in{K_1,K_2,K_3}##, rotation and boost generators respectable .

##A_i=\cfrac{1}{2}(J_i+iK_i)##, and

##[A_i,A_j]=i\epsilon_{ijk}A_k##

##[K_i,K_j]=-i\epsilon_{ijk}J_k##

##[J_i,K_j]=-i\epsilon_{ijk}K_k##

How proof that ##(m,n)A_i=J^{(m)}_i\otimes I_n## ?

I was proof that ##(m,n)(J_i+iK_i)=J^{(m)}_i\otimes I_n +I_m\otimes J^{(n)}_i \neq J^{(m)}_i\otimes I_n##

by definition that ## (m,n)(J_i,K_i)=J^{(m)}_i\otimes I_n + I_m\otimes K^{(n)}_i##

I was read Weinberg QFT Foundations , page 253 .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but i can't proof it .The result follows from the definition of the tensor product and the property that the generators of rotations and boosts commute with themselves. That is, the equation $$(m,n)(J_i+iK_i)=J^{(m)}_i\otimes I_n +I_m\otimes J^{(n)}_i$$holds because $$J_i\otimes I_n + I_m \otimes J_i = J_i\otimes I_n + I_m \otimes J_i$$ and $$K_i\otimes I_n + I_m \otimes K_i = K_i\otimes I_n + I_m \otimes K_i$$where $J_i$ and $K_i$ are the generators of rotations and boosts respectively.