Deduce that ## 13\mid (11^{12n+6}+1) ##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that for any integer \( n \geq 0 \), \( 13 \mid (11^{12n+6}+1) \) holds true. Utilizing Fermat's theorem, where \( a=11 \) and \( p=13 \), it is established that \( 11^{12} \equiv 1 \pmod{13} \). The proof demonstrates that \( 11^{12n+6}+1 \equiv 0 \pmod{13} \) through modular arithmetic, concluding that \( 13 \) divides \( (11^{12n+6}+1) \) for all non-negative integers \( n \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with proof techniques, particularly proof by induction
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Fermat's Little Theorem in depth
  • Learn advanced modular arithmetic techniques
  • Practice writing proofs by induction
  • Explore applications of modular arithmetic in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in modular arithmetic and proof techniques will benefit from this discussion.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
230
Homework Statement
From Fermat's theorem deduce that, for any integer ## n\geq 0, 13\mid (11^{12n+6}+1) ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Let ## n\geq 0 ## be any integer.
Applying the Fermat's theorem produces:
## a=11, p=13 ## and ## p\nmid a ##.
Then ## 11^{13-1}\equiv 1\pmod {13}\implies 11^{12}\equiv 1\pmod {13} ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
&11^{12n+6}+1\equiv [(11^{12})^{n}\cdot 11^{6}+1]\pmod {13}\\
&\equiv [1^{n}(-2)^{6}+1]\pmod {13}\\
&\equiv (64+1)\pmod {13}\\
&\equiv 65\pmod {13}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {13}.\\
\end{align*}
Thus ## 13\mid (11^{12n+6}+1) ##.
Therefore, ## 13\mid (11^{12n+6}+1) ## for any integer ## n\geq 0 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. If you want to try, you could probably try a proof by induction, too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
fresh_42 said:
Correct. If you want to try, you could probably try a proof by induction, too.
True, but I like using Fermat's theorem more. It's easier than proof by induction. I do want to admit that, I definitely need to practice more about writing proofs by induction, since I am not good at it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K