Defining Metaphysics and Supernatural: A Scientific Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definitions and distinctions between metaphysics and the supernatural from a scientific perspective. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in philosophy, religion, and the nature of existence.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that metaphysics relates to the laws of nature, while the supernatural pertains to phenomena outside those laws.
  • There is a viewpoint that metaphysics is subject to critical examination, unlike supernatural claims, which are often seen as untestable.
  • One participant argues that all things that exist are natural, questioning the merit of the supernatural as a concept.
  • Another participant proposes that dreams may represent a form of supernatural experience, suggesting they could be a means of observing reality.
  • Some participants discuss the historical context of the term "natural philosopher" and its relevance to the definitions of metaphysical and supernatural.
  • There are claims that supernatural phenomena could be understood as metaphysical phenomena that are currently beyond human understanding.
  • One participant asserts that if everything is natural, the term "supernatural" becomes meaningless, while others suggest it may refer to higher states of nature.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the existence of supernatural phenomena, while acknowledging the potential for things to exist beyond current understanding.
  • Some contributions highlight the relationship between science and historical perceptions of wizardry, suggesting a cultural evolution in understanding these concepts.
  • There are calls for examples of metaphysical and supernatural phenomena, with some participants providing examples like religion, consciousness, and ghosts.
  • One participant speculates about the nature of ghosts and their potential connection to atoms, indicating a curiosity about the intersection of science and supernatural beliefs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the definitions or implications of metaphysics and the supernatural. Disagreements persist regarding the validity and relevance of supernatural phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of metaphysics and the supernatural, which remain unresolved. The discussion includes speculative reasoning and personal interpretations that may not align with established scientific understanding.

  • #31
Upisoft said:
Now that made me think. I have metaphysical question. Why we say "traveling near the speed of light"? If something is not traveling at speed of light there is a frame of reference in which this object is in rest. (Well that frame can change if the object is accelerating or worse)

So either an object is traveling at speed of light (and therefore has rest mass 0) or it is at rest (with something).

I said NEAR the speed of light because the average forum participant would have to go on a major diet to go c ... assuming he/she is human and not a metaphysical photon collective. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
16K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K