- #31
Mr. Robin Parsons
- 1,243
- 0
Neither do 'they'...
News Defining Terrorism: Is There an Objective Definition?
- Thread starter Yaqout
- Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complex and often contentious definition of terrorism, highlighting the phrase "One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter" as a significant barrier to consensus. Participants explore various interpretations, emphasizing that terrorism typically involves the intentional harm of civilians to promote a cause, contrasting it with guerrilla warfare, which targets military personnel. The conversation delves into the implications of defining terrorism, particularly in international law and political contexts, where subjective interpretations complicate objective definitions. Key points include the distinction between rational and irrational motivations behind acts of terrorism, the legality of certain tactics under the Geneva Convention, and the moral dilemmas posed by historical events like the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The debate also touches on state terrorism and the role of governments in using fear as a means of control. Overall, the discussion reflects the difficulty in establishing a universally accepted definition of terrorism, influenced by cultural, political, and historical perspectives.