Definition of the potential energy operator

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
In quantum mechanics, I can write the hamiltonian as ##\hat{H} = \hat{p}^{2}/2m + \hat{V}##. I am confusing with the definition of the operator ##\hat{V}##, who represents the potential energy. If the potential energy depend only on the position, is it correct write ##\hat{V} = V(\hat{x})##? And, assuming that ##V## can be expanded in a power series of ##\hat{x}##, and using ##\hat{x} | x \rangle = x | x \rangle##, can I write ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle##? I would like know if this things I wrote are correct. Does anyone know a book or article that talk about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lebnm said:
assuming that ##V## can be expanded in a power series of ##\hat{x}##, and using ##\hat{x} | x \rangle = x | x \rangle##, can I write ##\hat{V} | x \rangle = V(x) | x \rangle##?
By definition of the position representation, this is correct for all ##V##, even if no series expansion exists.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Lebnm
A. Neumaier said:
By definition of the position representation, this is correct for all ##V##, even if no series expansion exists.

Why? Would not this imply that all potentials are local?

Do you have references about this? it has been difficult find books that talk about this.
 
Lebnm said:
Why? Would not this imply that all potentials are local?

Do you have references about this? it has been difficult find books that talk about this.
For all ##V(x) ##, as in your formula. Usually only such interactions get the name potential energy.