Definition of Topology - What Does {##U_\alpha | \alpha \in I##} Mean?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the notation {##U_\alpha | \alpha \in I##} in the context of topology, specifically within the definition of a topological space (X, τ). It establishes that τ is a collection of subsets of X, where the empty set and X itself must be included, and any finite intersection or arbitrary union of these subsets must also belong to τ. The conversation highlights the distinction between different topologies on the real numbers, emphasizing that the "usual" topology defined by open intervals is a specific choice, while the coarsest topology includes only the empty set and X.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic set theory concepts
  • Familiarity with the definition of a topological space
  • Knowledge of open and closed sets in topology
  • Basic understanding of real numbers and intervals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of different topologies on the real numbers
  • Learn about the concept of basis for a topology
  • Explore the implications of finite intersections and arbitrary unions in topology
  • Investigate the relationship between topology and metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying topology, as well as educators and researchers seeking to deepen their understanding of topological spaces and their properties.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I just started reading an introductory book about topology and I got a bit confused from the definition. One of the condition for a topological space is that if ##\tau## is a collection of subsets of X, we have {##U_\alpha | \alpha \in I##} implies ##\cup_{\alpha \in I} U_\alpha \in \tau ##. I assume this means that for any 2 sets in ##\tau## their union is also in ##\tau##. But I really don't understand the notation. What does {##U_\alpha | \alpha \in I##} mean? And how is it related to ##\tau##? And what is I? There is nothing before this, to define "I" and I found this definition in different books, so I assume i am missing something here. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A topological space ##(X,\tau)## is a set ##X## together with a set ##\tau## of subsets ##U_\alpha \subseteq X\, , \,\alpha \in I##. This means any number of subsets. Next there are some requirements for this set of sets ##\tau = \{U_\alpha \subseteq X\, | \,\alpha \in I\}##.
The empty set ##\emptyset## as well as the entire set ##X## have to be elements of ##\tau##.
Any finite intersection of ##U_\alpha \in \tau## must also be an element of ##\tau##.
Any arbitrary union of ##U_\alpha \in \tau## must also be an element of ##\tau##.
If these requirements hold, then ##\tau## is called a topology on ##X##, which means the elements ##U_\alpha## of ##\tau## are the subsets of ##X## we call open.

In short: A topology on ##X## is the definition ##\tau## of sets, which we call open sets.
As long as the conditions above hold, we're free to choose any subsets of ##X## as open. That's why spaces can carry more than one topology.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silviu
fresh_42 said:
A topological space ##(X,\tau)## is a set ##X## together with a set ##\tau## of subsets ##U_\alpha \subseteq X\, , \,\alpha \in I##. This means any number of subsets. Next there are some requirements for this set of sets ##\tau = \{U_\alpha \subseteq X\, | \,\alpha \in I\}##.
The empty set ##\emptyset## as well as the entire set ##X## have to be elements of ##\tau##.
Any finite intersection of ##U_\alpha \in \tau## must also be an element of ##\tau##.
Any arbitrary union of ##U_\alpha \in \tau## must also be an element of ##\tau##.
If these requirements hold, then ##\tau## is called a topology on ##X##, which means the elements ##U_\alpha## of ##\tau## are the subsets of ##X## we call open.

In short: A topology on ##X## is the definition ##\tau## of sets, which we call open sets.
As long as the conditions above hold, we're free to choose any subsets of ##X## as open. That's why spaces can carry more than one topology.
Thank you for your reply. It makes more sense now. So, just to make sure I understand, for example in R, we can define ##\emptyset## and R as the open sets in R and in this topology, by definition there are only 2 open sets? And the fact that we usually consider any interval (a,b) to be an open set in R is just a particular choice of topology on R?
 
Silviu said:
Thank you for your reply. It makes more sense now. So, just to make sure I understand, for example in R, we can define ##\emptyset## and R as the open sets in R and in this topology, by definition there are only 2 open sets? And the fact that we usually consider any interval (a,b) to be an open set in R is just a particular choice of topology on R?
Yes.
You probably see, that ##\{\emptyset,\mathbb{R}\}## isn't very interesting as a topology. It's the weakest or coarsest topology you can choose. The strongest or finest topology would be to declare for every single point ##p## the set ##\{p\}## as open set, which makes all subsets open (and simultaneously closed).

The "usual" topology defined by open intervals, is the topology, that comes from the Euclidean norm of ##\mathbb{R}## which gives us a tool to measure distances and ##"<"## conditions define something open, ##"\geq"## conditions something closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silviu
Silviu said:
One of the condition for a topological space is that if ##\tau## is a collection of subsets of X, we have {##U_\alpha | \alpha \in I##} implies ##\cup_{\alpha \in I} U_\alpha \in \tau ##.
For example, suppose we are in the "usual" topology on the real line where open intervals are examples of open sets. let ##I## denote the set of real numbers that are not rational numbers of the form ##\frac{k}{2^n}## where ##k## and ##n## are positive integers. For each ##r \in I## define ##U_r## to be the open interval ##( r - e^{-|r|}, r + e^{-|r|} )##. The union ##S## of all the sets ##U_r## cannot be represented as an infinite series of unions of the form ##U_{r_1} \cup U_{r_2} \cup U_{r_3} \cup ...## because such a representation assumes the indices are the countable infinity of integers, which isn't sufficient to index the uncountable number of sets we are dealing with. So the notation ##S = \cup_{\alpha \in I} U_{\alpha}## is used to indicate the uncountable union.

This is illustrates the distinction between an "arbitrary" union and a "countably infinite union".
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K