Deflect Asteroid w/ Collisions: Calculating Theta & MJ Interractions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dedocta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the feasibility of deflecting an asteroid using collisions that deliver approximately 32MJ of energy. The calculations involve determining the angle Theta based on the distance from the asteroid and the desired deflection distance, utilizing the equation 𝑚(𝑣1^2)(1−cos(𝜃)). An Excel spreadsheet was created to analyze the number of collisions required for trajectory modification, indicating that smaller asteroids can be deflected effectively, while larger ones like the Chicxulub asteroid present significant challenges. The conversation emphasizes the importance of momentum over energy in these calculations, particularly for non-perpendicular collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum and energy transfer in physics
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics and trajectory calculations
  • Proficiency in using Excel for mathematical modeling
  • Knowledge of asteroid dynamics and deflection strategies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced orbital mechanics for long-term asteroid deflection strategies
  • Explore momentum transfer techniques in collision physics
  • Learn about the physics of non-perpendicular collisions and their effects
  • Investigate existing asteroid deflection missions and their methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, planetary defense researchers, and anyone interested in asteroid deflection strategies and collision dynamics.

dedocta
Messages
11
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I'm looking for a way to calculate how much an asteroids trajectory would change, based off of a collision event.
In short, I was trying to look into feasibility of deflecting an asteroid with a collision of ~32MJ of direct energy. I wanted to know how many collisions are necessary to deflect at a given time out (distance away.)

I found this link, where the collision is perpendicular to the motion of the asteroid:

https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...an-asteroid-with-force-always-perpendicular-tSo, taking the following equation, and with the ideal scenario of a perpendicular collision we are left with an isosceles triangle, where we can solve for Theta based off of the distance away of the asteroid and the distance we want to deflect / modify trajectory.

𝑚(𝑣1^2)(1−cos(𝜃))

Asteroid Deflection.jpg


I then created an excel spreadsheet to calculate theta based off of the distance away and deflection distance, and asked how many 32MJ interractions it would take to change the trajectory by a certain distance at a certain time of collision. It would appear smaller asteroids it would be possible to change trajectories with this, however, not so much for the lower and upper bounds of the Chicxilub asteroid and another larger current NEO.

Would this be an acceptable way to do this? If so, I've been stuck on where to go next if the collision is not perpendicular, if anyone had any input?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Energy is largely useless for these calculations. It is all about momentum. A more massive object with the same energy in the asteroid reference frame will have a much larger effect on the orbit.

For short timescales (short compared to an orbit) the impact direction doesn't matter that much for the calculation: You give the asteroid a velocity change v that depends on your impact only, after time t its position will have changed by v*t. For longer timescales you have to consider orbital mechanics. As an extreme case: After one orbit the object will return to where it was, no matter how the impact was (neglecting perturbations by planets or similar). It might return earlier or later, however, that can work as deflection, too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dedocta

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K