Delayed choice two slit experiment - photon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the delayed choice two-slit experiment and its implications for understanding photon behavior in quantum mechanics. It asserts that the outcomes of this experiment are not influenced by retrocausal effects but rather by the measurement protocol that allows for the selection of subensembles of photons. The conversation references the "quantum eraser" experiment by Scully et al. and emphasizes the importance of moving beyond outdated concepts like "wave-particle duality" to grasp modern quantum theory, which emerged in the 1920s through matrix mechanics, wave mechanics, and transformation theory. The complexity of photons necessitates a foundation in relativistic quantum field theory for accurate description.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the delayed choice two-slit experiment
  • Knowledge of the quantum eraser experiment by Scully et al.
  • Basic concepts of relativistic quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the paper on the quantum eraser experiment by Scully et al. for deeper insights
  • Study matrix mechanics and wave mechanics as foundational aspects of modern quantum theory
  • Explore transformation theory as the most general form of quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic quantum field theory on photon behavior
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum theory and the behavior of photons in experimental settings.

Cobalt101
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Is it possible that the reason the delayed choice two slit experiment outcomes occur is because for the photon, traveling at the speed of light, the past, present and future are all as one, and therefore it "knows" what is going to happen and therefore always "makes the right choice" at the slit re adopting a wave or a particle state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The delayed choice has nothing to do with retrocausal influence on the experiment but just with the possibility to choose subensembles of the full ensemble of measured photons due to the measurement protocol containing the appropriate information. It's a bit difficult to explain without a concrete example. One of the most simple ones is the "quantum eraser" experiment proposed by Scully et al and first realized experimentally by Walborn et al:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0106078.pdf

I think, to understand the fascinating possibility of "postselection" due to quantum theory, it's good to read this paper. Then ask specific questions here in the forum when you have difficulties with it.

More generally, you should also get rid of some unfortunately common misconceptions in popular-science writings about quantum theory. Many authors use outdated concepts from the socalled "old quantum theory" and use the corresponding old-fashioned concepts like "wave-particle duality". Theoretical physics is, however, all about finding mathematical intrinsically consistent models (or even theories) that describe as accurately as possible observed facts, and "old quantum theory" was not satisfactory even for its discoverers (among them Planck, Einstein, Bohr, and de Broglie). That's why after an amazingly short time modern quantum theory has been discovered around 1925/26, and not only once but already in three different equivalent forms: matrix mechanics (Heisenberg, Born, Jordan), wave mechanics (Schrödinger), and "transformation theory" (Dirac). The latter is the most general form and usually taught at universities today.

Although a pleasure for experimentalists interested in the foundation of quantum theory for technical reasons, photons are among the most difficult concepts of the theory, because you need relativistic quantum field theory to accurately describe them. For no other elementary quantum field the idea to think about it in terms of classical particles as it is for photons. The classical limit are rather classical electromagnetic waves (i.e., coherent states in the quantum language). It's not even possible to define a position observable for them!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cobalt101 and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
966
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K