Demonstrating Subset Relationship: A ∩ B ⊆ (A ∩ C) ∪ (B ∩ C')

  • Thread starter Thread starter trixitium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
trixitium
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that:

[itex]A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex]

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I tryed distribute [itex](A \cap C) over (B \cap C')[/itex] but I'm always walking in circles and i don't came to a satisfactory answer. This exercise was in a section "some easy exercies on complementation" but i don't see how to use complements here.

Thanks
 

Discussion

Physics news on Phys.org
The standard way to show that "[itex]X\subseteq Y[/itex]" is to start "if [itex]x\in X[/itex]" and then use the definitions of X and Y to conclude "[itex]x\in Y[/itex]".

Here, if [itex]x\in A\cap B[/itex], what can you say about x?
 
Yes, [itex]C'[/itex] is the complement of [itex]C[/itex]

if [itex]x \in A \cap B[/itex],

by the definition of intersection:

[itex]A \cap B = \{x \in A : x \in B\}[/itex]

and we can conclude that x is simultaneously in A and B.

But my doubt, is how to reduced the [itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex] to a expression that i can readly see that [itex]A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex].

I tryed ...

[itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C') =[/itex]
[itex](A' \cup C')' \cup (B' \cup C)' =[/itex]
[itex][(A' \cup C') \cap (B' \cup C)]' =[/itex]
[itex](...)[/itex]
[itex]A \cup B \cup C'[/itex]

But it takes me a lot of work, I'm not sure if this result is correct and i think that exists a better way of doing this...

Thanks
 
You certainly know that [itex]X\subset Y[/itex] if and only if [itex]X \bigcap Y=X[/itex].
[itex]X=A\bigcap B[/itex] and [itex]Y=(A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex]

ehild
 
trixitium said:
Yes, [itex]C'[/itex] is the complement of [itex]C[/itex]

if [itex]x \in A \cap B[/itex],

by the definition of intersection:

[itex]A \cap B = \{x \in A : x \in B\}[/itex]

and we can conclude that x is simultaneously in A and B.

But my doubt, is how to reduced the [itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex] to a expression that i can readly see that [itex]A \cap B \subset (A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C')[/itex].
Good, we know x is in both A and B. And we know that x is either in C or it is NOT! That means x is C or it is in C'
Case 1: Suppose x is in C. We know it is in A therefore ...
Case 2: Suppose x is in C'. We know it is in B therefore ...

I tryed ...

[itex](A \cap C) \cup (B \cap C') =[/itex]
[itex](A' \cup C')' \cup (B' \cup C)' =[/itex]
[itex][(A' \cup C') \cap (B' \cup C)]' =[/itex]
[itex](...)[/itex]
[itex]A \cup B \cup C'[/itex]

But it takes me a lot of work, I'm not sure if this result is correct and i think that exists a better way of doing this...

Thanks
In my opinion, to much focus on "formulas", not enough on basic "definitions".