Demonstrating that a mapping is injective

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Injective Mapping
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating the injectivity of the homomorphism \(\theta: Hom_R(R, X) \to X\) defined by \(\theta(f) = f(1_R)\) as stated in Dummit and Foote's Proposition 28. The user, Peter, seeks assistance in proving that if \(\theta(f) = \theta(g)\), then \(f = g\) for \(f, g \in Hom_R(R, X)\). The key insight is recognizing that \(f\) and \(g\) are not arbitrary functions but morphisms in the category of \(R\)-modules, which leads to the conclusion that \(f(1_R) = g(1_R)\) implies \(f = g\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of R-modules and morphisms in category theory.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of homomorphisms and isomorphisms in algebra.
  • Knowledge of the definitions and properties of additive-group homomorphisms.
  • Basic understanding of the notation and terminology used in Dummit and Foote's "Abstract Algebra".
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of homomorphisms in the context of R-modules.
  • Learn about the concept of injective and surjective functions in algebra.
  • Review the proof techniques used in Proposition 28 of Dummit and Foote.
  • Explore examples of isomorphisms in algebraic structures to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone studying module theory or abstract algebra, particularly those working with homomorphisms and isomorphisms in R-modules.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 10.5 : Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I am studying Proposition 28 (D&F pages 387 - 388)

In the latter stages of the proof of Proposition 28 we find the following statement (top of page 388):

"In general, Hom_R (R, X) \cong X, the isomorphism being given by mapping a homomorphism to its value on the element 1 \in R"

I am having some trouble in demonstrating the isomorphism involved in the relationship Hom_R (R, X) \cong X.

To demonstrate the isomorphism I proceeded as follows:

Let f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) so f,g : \ R \to X

Consider \theta \ : \ Hom_R (R,X) \to X

where \theta (f) = f(1_R)

To show \theta is a homomorphism we proceed as follows:

\theta (f + g) = (f + g)(1_R) = f(1_R) + g(1_R)

= \theta (f) + \theta (g)

and

\theta (rf) = (rf) = rf (1_R) = r \theta (f) where r \in R

Then I need to show \theta is injective and surjective.

BUT ... I am having problems in demonstrating that \theta is injective ... can someone help me with this task?Note that I suspect one would proceed as follows:

Suppose we have f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) such that:

\theta (f) = f(1_R) and \theta (g) = f(1_R)

Now we have, of course, by definition of g, that \theta (g) = g(1_R)

So f(1_R) = g(1_R) ... but how do we proceed from here to show that f = g?

Hope someone can help.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 10.5 : Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I am studying Proposition 28 (D&F pages 387 - 388)

In the latter stages of the proof of Proposition 28 we find the following statement (top of page 388):

"In general, Hom_R (R, X) \cong X, the isomorphism being given by mapping a homomorphism to its value on the element 1 \in R"

I am having some trouble in demonstrating the isomorphism involved in the relationship Hom_R (R, X) \cong X.

To demonstrate the isomorphism I proceeded as follows:

Let f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) so f,g : \ R \to X

Consider \theta \ : \ Hom_R (R,X) \to X

where \theta (f) = f(1_R)

To show \theta is a homomorphism we proceed as follows:

\theta (f + g) = (f + g)(1_R) = f(1_R) + g(1_R)

= \theta (f) + \theta (g)

and

\theta (rf) = (rf) = rf (1_R) = r \theta (f) where r \in R

Then I need to show \theta is injective and surjective.

BUT ... I am having problems in demonstrating that \theta is injective ... can someone help me with this task?


Note that I suspect one would proceed as follows:

Suppose we have f, g \in Hom_R (R,X) such that:

\theta (f) = f(1_R) and \theta (g) = f(1_R)

Now we have, of course, by definition of g, that \theta (g) = g(1_R)

So f(1_R) = g(1_R) ... but how do we proceed from here to show that f = g?

You haven't yet used the fact that f and g are not arbitrary functions from R to X, but morphisms in the category of R-modules.

If f \in \mathrm{Hom}_R(X_1, X_2) then by definition f is an additive-group homomorphism which also satisfies f(rx) = rf(x) for all r \in R and all x \in X_1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K