I Density fluctuations and the color of the sky

Click For Summary
The color of the sky is primarily explained by Rayleigh scattering, which requires density fluctuations in the atmosphere. Despite atoms being localized and not uniform, their density can still exhibit significant deviations, leading to blue light scattering. The discussion raises the question of whether the positions of atoms need to be correlated yet disordered for the sky to appear blue. It suggests that even in an ordered state, the inherent density fluctuations due to atomic positioning can still result in blue scattering. Ultimately, the relationship between atomic arrangement and light scattering remains a complex topic.
pines-demon
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
980
Reaction score
823
From posts like this I get that the color of the sky is explained by Rayleigh scattering, but needs density fluctuations. However as atoms are not uniform and are localized, the density is
$$\rho(\mathbf r)=\sum_i \delta(\mathbf r-\mathbf r_i)$$
where ##i## sums over all the atom positions ##\mathbf r_i##. So even if the atoms were ordered and not moving in any way, the average of the density is very different from its deviations, that can be quite large (because there are deltas), and one would still have blue light scattering. Right? The fluctuations are already a given due to the form of the density.


Or do the position of the atoms needs to be correlated but disordered in order for the sky to be blue?
 
Last edited:
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...