Derivatice of Complex Impedance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Opus_723
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Impedance
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around taking the derivative of the impedance of a parallel RLC circuit with respect to frequency ω to find the frequency at which maximum impedance occurs. The user encounters an imaginary result, ω = i/√(LC), which raises questions about the validity of such an outcome. It is clarified that complex functions do not have extrema in the conventional sense, and the user should instead focus on the modulus of the impedance for meaningful results. The importance of correctly differentiating complex terms is emphasized, as mistakes can lead to incorrect conclusions. Ultimately, the user learns that seeking the maximum of the impedance modulus is the appropriate approach.
Opus_723
Messages
175
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



[Edit: Sorry for the typo in the thread title]

I'm doing a problem that involves taking the derivative of the impedance of a parallel RLC circuit with respect to the frequency ω of the applied voltage. I have to then set that derivative equal to zero to find the frequency at which the maximum impedance occurs. I'm pretty sure I did everything mostly right, but my answer ended up being imaginary. I ended up with ω = \frac{i}{\sqrt{LC}}. I'm sure the coefficient is right, since that's the resonant frequency of the undamped circuit. But should it really be imaginary? That seems odd to me. I've never actually taken the derivative of anything involving i before, so there might be something different you have to do that I don't know about. Anyway, I'm going to post my work. If someone could point out where I messed up (or explain why it's okay for the answer to be imaginary) it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Homework Equations

Z = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R}+iωC -\frac{i}{ωL}}

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dZ}{dω} = -1(\frac{1}{R}+iωC -\frac{i}{ωL})^{-2}(iC+\frac{i}{ω^{2}L})

-iC-\frac{i}{ω^{2}L} = 0

ω^{2} = \frac{-1}{LC}

ω = \frac{i}{\sqrt{LC}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Opus_723 said:

Homework Statement



[Edit: Sorry for the typo in the thread title]

I'm doing a problem that involves taking the derivative of the impedance of a parallel RLC circuit with respect to the frequency ω of the applied voltage. I have to then set that derivative equal to zero to find the frequency at which the maximum impedance occurs. I'm pretty sure I did everything mostly right, but my answer ended up being imaginary. I ended up with ω = \frac{i}{\sqrt{LC}}. I'm sure the coefficient is right, since that's the resonant frequency of the undamped circuit. But should it really be imaginary? That seems odd to me. I've never actually taken the derivative of anything involving i before, so there might be something different you have to do that I don't know about. Anyway, I'm going to post my work. If someone could point out where I messed up (or explain why it's okay for the answer to be imaginary) it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Homework Equations

Z = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R}+iωC -\frac{i}{ωL}}

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{dZ}{dω} = -1(\frac{1}{R}+iωC -\frac{i}{ωL})^{-2}(iC+\frac{i}{ω^{2}L})

-iC-\frac{i}{ω^{2}L} = 0

ω^{2} = \frac{-1}{LC}

ω = \frac{i}{\sqrt{LC}}
I guess you do have to be careful when differentiating something with 'i' in it, because apparently $$\frac{d}{d\omega}\left(\frac{-i}{\omega L}\right) = \frac{i}{\omega^2 L}$$No negative sign.
 
I'm not sure I understand. That looks like what I did. I know there's no negative sign.

\frac{d}{dω}(\frac{-i}{L}ω^{-1}) = -1(\frac{-i}{L})ω^{-2} = \frac{i}{Lω^{2}}

This is what I did above.
 
There is no less/greater relation for complex number so complex function cannot have extremum. Actually you are seeking extremum of impedance modulus:
|Z|=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{R^2}+\left(\omega C-\frac{1}{\omega L}\right)^2}}
 
That makes sense. I get the right answer taking that derivative instead. I suppose I should have realized that a maximum of a complex function doesn't make a lot of sense.

Funny thing is, i tried the modulus first, but accidentally skipped a step in the derivative and so I lost the real root of the equation, and only got the complex one, which is the same thing i got above. I wonder if finding the zeros of the complex function always gives you the complex roots of the modulus?

Anyway, thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
846
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
669
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K