A Derivation of recovery channel for bit flip error

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the recovery channel for a bit flip error channel, specifically how to reach the final result from the initial definitions. The recovery channel R is expressed in terms of operators A_i and B_j, which are identified as the bit flip operator σ_x. By substituting these operators into the recovery channel equation, the derivation simplifies to a sum over the combined effects of the bit flip operations. Ultimately, the final result shows that the recovery channel can be expressed as a sum involving the bit flip operator applied to the state ρ. This derivation clarifies the relationship between the recovery channel and the bit flip error channel.
steve1763
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I have found a derivation of the recovery channel for a bit flip error (using the derivation of the Knill-Laflamme condition), but dont quite understand it.
In general, if R is the recovery channel of an error channel ε, with state ρ, then
Screenshot 2021-07-27 at 15.18.43.png

and according to these lecture slides, we get the final result highlighted in red for a bit flip error channel. I am simply asking how one reaches this final result. Thank you (a full-ish derivation can be found at https://orion.math.iastate.edu/ytpoon/publication/qecc1.pdf on pages 6-7, but for some reason i still don't understand how one gets to the final answer).

Screenshot 2021-07-27 at 15.20.15.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get the final result, we start by applying the definition of recovery channel:\begin{align}R(\rho) &= \sum_i A_i \rho A_i^\dagger \\&= \sum_i A_i \rho A_i^\dagger \sum_j B_j \rho B_j^\dagger \\&= \sum_{i,j} A_i \rho A_i^\dagger B_j \rho B_j^\dagger\end{align}Now, for a bit flip error channel, we have $A_i = \sigma_x^i$ and $B_j = \sigma_x^j$. Substituting these values into the equation above gives us\begin{align}R(\rho) &= \sum_{i,j} \sigma_x^i \rho \sigma_x^{i\dagger} \sigma_x^j \rho \sigma_x^{j\dagger} \\&= \sum_{i,j} \sigma_x^i \rho \sigma_x^i \sigma_x^j \rho \sigma_x^j \\&= \sum_{i,j} \sigma_x^{i+j} \rho \sigma_x^{i+j} \\&= \sum_k \sigma_x^k \rho \sigma_x^k\end{align}where $k = i + j$. This is the final result.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...