Derive Convolution Expression for Z_PDF(z)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rabbed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution deriving
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the convolution expression for the probability density function (PDF) of the sum of two independent random variables, Z = X + Y. The participants explore the relationship between Z_PDF(z), X_PDF(x), and Y_PDF(y), emphasizing that Z_PDF(z) must account for all combinations of X and Y that sum to z. They conclude that the correct formulation involves integrating the joint PDF of X and Y over the appropriate region, leading to the convolution formula: Z_PDF(z) = ∫ X_PDF(x) * Y_PDF(z-x) dx. The necessity of proper integration limits and the independence of X and Y are also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability density functions (PDFs)
  • Familiarity with convolution in probability theory
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly for joint distributions
  • Basic concepts of independent random variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the convolution theorem in probability theory
  • Learn about joint probability distributions and their properties
  • Explore the application of the Leibniz integral rule for differentiating under the integral sign
  • Investigate the derivation of convolution formulas for multiple independent random variables
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and mathematicians interested in probability theory, particularly those working with random variable transformations and convolution operations.

  • #61
As far as I can tell, you aren't presenting any logical arguments. You are conjecturing various formulas and asking for criticism of them. That's a permissible approach in the early stages of an investigation, but you should follow-up a conjecture by testing it with some simple examples instead of relying on my comments. it's ok to make conjectures by resorting to "magic" - such as writing down symbols like "dx/dx" without asking what they symbolize. But you should proceed to working specific examples that force you to make specific interpretations. (I'm about to get busy for a few days with the jobs of being executor of an estate, so I'm not going to have time to criticize a hundred different conjectures.) - In fact I just got a phone call and I must leave right now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
I think the essence here is that for multiple variables/dimensions we need to use line/surface integrals
and that it starts to make more sense to use the joint PDF of the source RV's.
XY_PDF(x,y)*sqrt(dx^2 + dy^2) = X_PDF(x)*|dx| * Y_PDF(y)*sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2)

Hm, maybe regular multidimensional integration comes in when considering inequalities, like Z < X+Y.

I'll keep exploring. Thanks for all help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
914
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K