Deriving the area of a spherical triangle from the metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the area of a spherical triangle using the metric for a 2-sphere, defined as $$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2 \sin(r/R) d\theta^2$$. Participants explore the relationship between the area of a triangle and the metric tensor, concluding that specific parameters are necessary to define a triangle on a spherical surface. The area can be expressed through integrals, specifically $$Area = \int_0^A \int_0^r R \sin(r/R) dr d\theta$$, but requires three defining parameters for complete specification. The conversation highlights the distinction between geodesics and linear segments in spherical geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical geometry and spherical triangles
  • Familiarity with metric tensors in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for area calculation
  • Basic concepts of geodesics and their significance in curved surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of area formulas for spherical triangles using spherical coordinates
  • Explore the properties of the metric tensor in differential geometry
  • Learn about geodesics on curved surfaces and their applications
  • Investigate the relationship between angles and area in spherical trigonometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of geometry interested in advanced concepts of spherical trigonometry and differential geometry.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
The metric for 2-sphere is $$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2sin(r/R)d\theta^2$$

Is there an equation to describe the area of an triangle by using metric.

Note: I know the formulation by using the angles but I am asking for an equation by using only the metric.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,
I think that the area of a triangle in metric would be the same as in imperial. It is just a ratio really. 1/2 B * H
would be the same for metric right?

unless you take the sector and neglect the segment.; Triangle = sector - segment. You could probably derive this in radians easily enough.

jeff
 
jeff davis said:
Hello,
I think that the area of a triangle in metric would be the same as in imperial. It is just a ratio really. 1/2 B * H
would be the same for metric right?

unless you take the sector and neglect the segment.; Triangle = sector - segment. You could probably derive this in radians easily enough.

jeff
I did not understand what you are trying to mean.
 
Well kind of. But I understand the problem ...so I guess there's no need
 
Arman777 said:
Is there an equation to describe the area of an triangle by using metric.
It is unclear what you mean. You obviously need some information about the triangle itself. Which information about the triangle do you want to use? Or are you after a more general integral expression for the area of a part of the sphere?

jeff davis said:
I think that the area of a triangle in metric would be the same as in imperial.
This is not about units, it is about the metric tensor used in differential geometry as applied to a curved surface.
 
1572603145456.png


Orodruin said:
It is unclear what you mean. You obviously need some information about the triangle itself
Yes I realized that after some time later. First I thought that from the metric we can define a general area equation for any spherical triangle. However as you mentioned that's possible.. Let's suppose we have a triangle like this. N is the north pole and it makes an angle of A. From the metric I find that the angle can be expressed as

$$Area = \int_0^A \int_0^r Rsin(r/R)drd\theta$$
 
Last edited:
Your triangle is not well defined, you need to specify three numbers to completely specify the triangle.
 
Orodruin said:
Your triangle is not well defined, you need to specify three numbers to completely specify the triangle.
Well yes sorry the other length is also r. So the bottom length becomes ##ARsin(r/R)dr## (from ##ds = Rsin(r/R)d\theta)##

Actually the area is $$Area = \int_0^rARsin(r/R)dr$$ but this is also equal to $$Area = \int_0^A \int_0^r Rsin(r/R)drd\theta$$
 
  • #10
That is not a triangle. A triangle has geodesics as its sides and the line with the bottom length you have specified is not a geodesic unless ##r## is the distance from the pole to the equator.
 
  • #11
Orodruin said:
That is not a triangle. A triangle has geodesics as its sides and the line with the bottom length you have specified is not a geodesic unless ##r## is the distance from the pole to the equator.
Hmm I know that ##r ∈[0, \pi R/2)##. But that's confusing. I mean

1572605300894.png


$$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2sin(r/R)^2d\theta^2$$ so for ##h##, ##dr = 0 (?)##.

I see you are meaning that if ##r\ne \pi R/2## then ##dr\ne0##

If we know the value of the A is it possible to find the h from sherical trigonometry (without knowing the value of ##r##)? I guess metric is useless to find the ##h## then
 
  • #12
Unless you know three parameters describing the triangle, it is impossible to find the others. This is true also in Euclidean space. If you do not know r, it is impossible to find h just based on the angle.
 
  • #13
Hmm I see. I ll try to look something else for solution. Thanks then
 
  • #14
Orodruin said:
line with the bottom length you have specified is not a geodesic unless rrr is the distance from the pole to the equator.
I ma kind of having trouble to understand this. At post 11 $$h = ARsin(r/R)$$ ? I mean it has to be that way..
 
  • #15
Arman777 said:
I ma kind of having trouble to understand this. At post 11 $$h = ARsin(r/R)$$ ? I mean it has to be that way..
Again, this is not a triangle. It is a circle sector.
 
  • #16
Orodruin said:
Again, this is not a triangle. It is a circle sector.
Okay.. umm then how can I find the area of that thing. What should I do ? Is it better maybe to use spherical coordinates ?
 
  • #17
Of the circle sector or the triangle?
 
  • #18
Orodruin said:
Of the circle sector or the triangle?
Triangle
 
  • #19
Arman777 said:
The metric for 2-sphere is $$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2sin(r/R)d\theta^2$$

Here, by ##r## do you mean ##R \theta##? Then your metric would be the more familiar form.
$$ds^2 = R^2 ( d^2 \theta + \sin^2(\theta ) d^2 \phi )$$

And ##\theta## would have range 0 to ## \pi## and ##\phi## would have range 0 to ##2 \pi##. Then it all becomes very familiar surface-of-a-sphere type geometry. Is that it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #20
Well that could have helped I guess, yes.
But I used the spherical trigonometry to find the area of the triangle.. But the metric you wrote also seems well for my problem as well. Sadly I already handed out the paper...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K