Deriving the area of a spherical triangle from the metric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on deriving the area of a spherical triangle using the metric of a 2-sphere. Participants explore the relationship between the metric and the area of triangles, considering various formulations and the implications of spherical geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the metric for a 2-sphere and inquires about an area equation based solely on the metric.
  • Another participant suggests that the area formula for triangles remains consistent across metric systems, proposing a traditional area formula involving base and height.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the definitions and parameters needed to describe a spherical triangle accurately.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of specifying three parameters to define a triangle on a sphere, with emphasis on the importance of geodesics.
  • One participant attempts to derive an area expression using integrals based on the metric but faces challenges in defining the triangle correctly.
  • Several participants debate the validity of certain geometric constructs, with some asserting that the described shapes do not constitute triangles.
  • There is mention of using spherical coordinates as a potential approach to finding areas related to the discussed shapes.
  • One participant notes the connection between their metric and a more familiar form of spherical geometry, suggesting a possible avenue for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to deriving the area of a spherical triangle using the metric. Multiple competing views and uncertainties about the definitions and parameters persist throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the triangle's parameters and the implications of the metric tensor in curved spaces. There is also ambiguity regarding the relationship between the proposed shapes and traditional triangle definitions.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
The metric for 2-sphere is $$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2sin(r/R)d\theta^2$$

Is there an equation to describe the area of an triangle by using metric.

Note: I know the formulation by using the angles but I am asking for an equation by using only the metric.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,
I think that the area of a triangle in metric would be the same as in imperial. It is just a ratio really. 1/2 B * H
would be the same for metric right?

unless you take the sector and neglect the segment.; Triangle = sector - segment. You could probably derive this in radians easily enough.

jeff
 
jeff davis said:
Hello,
I think that the area of a triangle in metric would be the same as in imperial. It is just a ratio really. 1/2 B * H
would be the same for metric right?

unless you take the sector and neglect the segment.; Triangle = sector - segment. You could probably derive this in radians easily enough.

jeff
I did not understand what you are trying to mean.
 
Well kind of. But I understand the problem ...so I guess there's no need
 
Arman777 said:
Is there an equation to describe the area of an triangle by using metric.
It is unclear what you mean. You obviously need some information about the triangle itself. Which information about the triangle do you want to use? Or are you after a more general integral expression for the area of a part of the sphere?

jeff davis said:
I think that the area of a triangle in metric would be the same as in imperial.
This is not about units, it is about the metric tensor used in differential geometry as applied to a curved surface.
 
1572603145456.png


Orodruin said:
It is unclear what you mean. You obviously need some information about the triangle itself
Yes I realized that after some time later. First I thought that from the metric we can define a general area equation for any spherical triangle. However as you mentioned that's possible.. Let's suppose we have a triangle like this. N is the north pole and it makes an angle of A. From the metric I find that the angle can be expressed as

$$Area = \int_0^A \int_0^r Rsin(r/R)drd\theta$$
 
Last edited:
Your triangle is not well defined, you need to specify three numbers to completely specify the triangle.
 
Orodruin said:
Your triangle is not well defined, you need to specify three numbers to completely specify the triangle.
Well yes sorry the other length is also r. So the bottom length becomes ##ARsin(r/R)dr## (from ##ds = Rsin(r/R)d\theta)##

Actually the area is $$Area = \int_0^rARsin(r/R)dr$$ but this is also equal to $$Area = \int_0^A \int_0^r Rsin(r/R)drd\theta$$
 
  • #10
That is not a triangle. A triangle has geodesics as its sides and the line with the bottom length you have specified is not a geodesic unless ##r## is the distance from the pole to the equator.
 
  • #11
Orodruin said:
That is not a triangle. A triangle has geodesics as its sides and the line with the bottom length you have specified is not a geodesic unless ##r## is the distance from the pole to the equator.
Hmm I know that ##r ∈[0, \pi R/2)##. But that's confusing. I mean

1572605300894.png


$$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2sin(r/R)^2d\theta^2$$ so for ##h##, ##dr = 0 (?)##.

I see you are meaning that if ##r\ne \pi R/2## then ##dr\ne0##

If we know the value of the A is it possible to find the h from sherical trigonometry (without knowing the value of ##r##)? I guess metric is useless to find the ##h## then
 
  • #12
Unless you know three parameters describing the triangle, it is impossible to find the others. This is true also in Euclidean space. If you do not know r, it is impossible to find h just based on the angle.
 
  • #13
Hmm I see. I ll try to look something else for solution. Thanks then
 
  • #14
Orodruin said:
line with the bottom length you have specified is not a geodesic unless rrr is the distance from the pole to the equator.
I ma kind of having trouble to understand this. At post 11 $$h = ARsin(r/R)$$ ? I mean it has to be that way..
 
  • #15
Arman777 said:
I ma kind of having trouble to understand this. At post 11 $$h = ARsin(r/R)$$ ? I mean it has to be that way..
Again, this is not a triangle. It is a circle sector.
 
  • #16
Orodruin said:
Again, this is not a triangle. It is a circle sector.
Okay.. umm then how can I find the area of that thing. What should I do ? Is it better maybe to use spherical coordinates ?
 
  • #17
Of the circle sector or the triangle?
 
  • #18
Orodruin said:
Of the circle sector or the triangle?
Triangle
 
  • #19
Arman777 said:
The metric for 2-sphere is $$ds^2 = dr^2 + R^2sin(r/R)d\theta^2$$

Here, by ##r## do you mean ##R \theta##? Then your metric would be the more familiar form.
$$ds^2 = R^2 ( d^2 \theta + \sin^2(\theta ) d^2 \phi )$$

And ##\theta## would have range 0 to ## \pi## and ##\phi## would have range 0 to ##2 \pi##. Then it all becomes very familiar surface-of-a-sphere type geometry. Is that it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #20
Well that could have helped I guess, yes.
But I used the spherical trigonometry to find the area of the triangle.. But the metric you wrote also seems well for my problem as well. Sadly I already handed out the paper...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K