Detecting Quarks: How Found & Isolated?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ghery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quarks
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discovery of quarks as constituents of nucleons was established through experiments at SLAC, where high-speed electrons were directed at protons, revealing three scattering centers indicative of quark presence. This observation was further supported by the detection of jets produced during proton collisions, which suggested protons are not elementary particles. The Adler sum rule and the Gross & Llewellen-Smith sum rule provide quantitative measures of valence quarks, with experimental results indicating approximately 2.8 valence quarks, reinforcing the conclusion of three quarks per nucleon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Familiarity with particle physics terminology, including "jets" and "partons"
  • Knowledge of high-energy particle collision experiments
  • Basic grasp of sum rules in particle physics, specifically the Adler and Gross & Llewellen-Smith sum rules
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and its implications in particle physics
  • Study the Adler sum rule and its significance in measuring quark distributions
  • Explore the Gross & Llewellen-Smith sum rule and its experimental challenges
  • Investigate the concept of jets in high-energy collisions and their role in particle detection
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students studying the fundamental structure of matter will benefit from this discussion.

ghery
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi:

I have heard that It was found at SLAC that the nucleons are made of 3 quarks, how did they found that if quarks can not be isolated?, and by the way, how do you detect those quarks if they can not be found free in nature?

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shooting high speed electrons at protons led to the observation that there are three scattering centers in the protons.
 
mathman said:
Shooting high speed electrons at protons led to the observation that there are three scattering centers in the protons.
I have never felt at ease with this answer. There is an arbitrary large number of partons in a hadrons, provided one looks close enough. So I always thought "three scatering centers" is oversimplfying. But maybe you'd call this nitpicking.
 
ghery said:
Hi:

I have heard that It was found at SLAC that the nucleons are made of 3 quarks, how did they found that if quarks can not be isolated?, and by the way, how do you detect those quarks if they can not be found free in nature?

Regards

When you shoot two protons against each other, if protons were elementary particles, you would observed two scattered protons after the collisions (I'm simplifying).
Instead of that, we observe what we call two "jets" back to back + some remnants. Jet is a collimated flux of hadrons particles (protons, neutrons + other weird particles called pions, kaons,...). We interpret this inelastic collision as the proof that protons are not elementary particles and our models are predicting that the elementary particles constituing the protons would produce jets when escaping from each other.

I'm not sure if I was clear... :-)
 
humanino said:
There is an arbitrary large number of partons in a hadrons, provided one looks close enough. So I always thought "three scatering centers" is oversimplfying. But maybe you'd call this nitpicking.

What's actually done is to look at relationships called QCD sum rules, which are related to the number of valence quarks: in particular, the Adler sum rule measures N(u) - N(d) and experimentally this is equal to 1. Add that to the quark charge assignments and you get 3 valence quarks. More directly is the Gross & Llewellen-Smith sum rule, which measures N(u) + N(d). Unfortunately, this is rather hard to measure and there are higher-order QCD corrections which make the measured quantity about 11-12% low. The measurement is around 2.5, so N(u) + N(d) is measured to be close to 2.8 or so: closer to three than any other integer, but not exactly what the simple calculations lead one to expect.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K