Determinant of the variance-covariance matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingwinner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix ∑ and the existence of its inverse. It establishes that if det(∑) = 0, then the inverse does not exist, indicating a linear dependence between the components of the random vector X. Specifically, it implies that there are non-zero constants c1 and c2 such that a linear combination of X1 and X2 equals a constant almost surely. The participants suggest proving this by calculating the variance of the linear combination D = c1X1 + c2X2 in relation to the elements of the variance-covariance matrix. Understanding this relationship clarifies the conditions under which the determinant equals zero.
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Let ∑ be the variance-covariance matrix of a random vector X. The first component of X is X1, and the second component of X is X2.

Then det(∑)=0
<=> the inverse of ∑ does not exist

<=> there exists c≠0 such that

a.s.
d=(c1)(X1)+(c2)(X2) (i.e. (c1)(X1)+(c2)(X2) is equal to some constant d almost surely)
=======================

I don't understand the last part. Why is it true? How can we prove it?

Any help is appreciated!:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write
<br /> \sigma = \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_1^2 &amp; \sigma_{12}\\ \sigma_{21} &amp; \sigma_2^2\end{bmatrix}<br />

and then write down the expression for its determinant, noting that it equals zero.

Now, take

<br /> D = c_1X_1 + c_2X_2<br />

and use the usual rules to write out the variance of D in terms of c_1, c_2 and the elements of \sigma.

Compare the determinant to the expression just obtained - you should see that why the statement is true.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K