Determine the validity of the number problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of the number problem concerning the even number 38. It is clarified that 38 can only be expressed as the sum of the two primes 31 and 7, making it a unique case. Participants note that other even numbers, like 32 and 34, can be expressed as sums of different prime pairs, which supports the claim that 38 is a counterexample. The confusion arose from the requirement to find two distinct prime sums for even numbers, which 38 does not satisfy. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the claim about 38 being a counterexample is correct.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
ii. Find a number between ##30## and ##50##which shows the statement is false.
Relevant Equations
numbers
1614479518888.png


my question is on part ii. Only,

the marking scheme indicates that the answer is ##38=31+7## only. My question is why is this False? ##38## is an even number, ##7## and ##31## are two different prime numbers and their sum gives us ##38##!
i would say##32=13+17+2##
##31=13+17+1##

which is false, ooooh! unless the value indicated above is only true for value ##38## and not any other value between ##30## and ##50##. English was a problem there... :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
It says it needs to be summed in two different ways. For example 16=11+5 and also 16=13+3, you need two different sums of two primes.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and chwala
Office_Shredder said:
It says it needs to be summed in two different ways. For example 16=11+5 and also 16=13+3, you need two different sums of two primes.
Aaargh I see that now...thanks
 
chwala said:
Aaargh I see that now...thanks
##32=29+3=13+19##
 
So 32 it's not a counterexample. The claim is you can do this for all even numbers, and the solution says that 38 is the counterexample.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
I agree,I understand now...its very clear. The claim is false because of ##38## as you have clearly shown...Thank you once again...
 
Office_Shredder said:
So 32 it's not a counterexample. The claim is you can do this for all even numbers, and the solution says that 38 is the counterexample.
True, whereas in the even numbers like
##32= 3+29 = 13+19## [3 to 13 (+10)...therefore for 29 (-10) = 19]
##34=5+29 = 11+23## [5 to 11 (+ 6)...therefore for 29 ( -6) = 23]

Now the number ##38## can only be expressed in the form ##38= 7+31## and no any other combination.
 
Back
Top