jwxie
- 278
- 0
If it is not an onto function, provide the range.
I have problems with these two
g: R -> R
g(x) = x^2 + x
g(x) = x^3
The book said g1 is neither onto nor 1-1, while g2 is both
I see how x^2 + x is not `1-1 function. But how come it is not onto? I mean R is real number, can be 343.3434534564656757 or 67.23123132 or anything that is real number. How can we quickly show that x^2 + x is not onto? There are -inf, inf real numbers, so how can we say there is a particular g(x) left out?
One way I see is if x^2 + x = 0 and we get x = sqrt(-x) which is an i num
I see x^3 is a 1-1 because x1 = x2. in a similar way as in the case of g1, how can we be so sure that all real numbers can be produce?
In the book, things like x^3 its surjectiveness can be proven as following
x^3 and if r is any real number in codomain of f, then real number cubic root of r is in the domain of f and since f(cubic root of r) = (cubic root of r)^3 = r, so f = R = range of f, so it is onto (copied from book)
Thanks
I have problems with these two
g: R -> R
g(x) = x^2 + x
g(x) = x^3
The book said g1 is neither onto nor 1-1, while g2 is both
I see how x^2 + x is not `1-1 function. But how come it is not onto? I mean R is real number, can be 343.3434534564656757 or 67.23123132 or anything that is real number. How can we quickly show that x^2 + x is not onto? There are -inf, inf real numbers, so how can we say there is a particular g(x) left out?
One way I see is if x^2 + x = 0 and we get x = sqrt(-x) which is an i num
I see x^3 is a 1-1 because x1 = x2. in a similar way as in the case of g1, how can we be so sure that all real numbers can be produce?
In the book, things like x^3 its surjectiveness can be proven as following
x^3 and if r is any real number in codomain of f, then real number cubic root of r is in the domain of f and since f(cubic root of r) = (cubic root of r)^3 = r, so f = R = range of f, so it is onto (copied from book)
Thanks