Determining if a set is a subspace.

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AngrySnorlax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Subspace
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a specific set of vectors in {R}^{3} is a subspace. Participants explore the criteria for subspaces, including the presence of the zero vector and closure under addition and scalar multiplication. The context includes both theoretical understanding and practical application of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • AngrySnorlax presents a problem regarding the subset of {R}^{3} consisting of vectors of the form $$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right]$$ and seeks to determine if it is a subspace.
  • Some participants suggest applying the three conditions for a subspace: containing the zero vector, closure under addition, and closure under scalar multiplication.
  • Dan emphasizes that the zero vector can be expressed in the form $$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right]$$ by setting a = 0 and b = 0.
  • Another participant notes that the condition for containing the zero vector can be relaxed if the set is non-empty, as closure under addition and scalar multiplication would imply the presence of the zero vector.
  • Participants discuss how to verify closure under addition by showing that the sum of two vectors of the form $$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right]$$ remains in the same form.
  • There is an exploration of the intuitive understanding of the set as containing all 3-vectors with a second coordinate of zero, which leads to further reasoning about the conditions for being a subspace.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the criteria for determining a subspace but express uncertainty in applying these criteria to the specific problem. There is no consensus on the best approach to clarify the application of the steps involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the application of the conditions for subspaces, indicating a need for further clarification on how to approach the problem. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the implications of each condition without resolving the specific problem at hand.

AngrySnorlax
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey there guys, its AngrySnorlax here again with another problem. I posted here before when I was having an issue and the responses I got were extremely helpful because there was a specific step that I just could not grasp that was explained to me and I am hoping that is the same situation here with these problems.

I am trying to determine how to tell if a set is a subspace. The problem reads like this:
Determine if the described set is a subspace. If so, give a proof. If not, explain why not. Unless stated otherwise, a, b, and c are real numbers.

The subset of {R}^{3} consisting of vectors of the form
$$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right]$$

The answer at the back of the book reads this:
This is a subspace, equal to span
$$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array}\right]$$$$\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{array}\right]$$

Now I am aware that there are three steps, but I am not entirely sure on how to use these steps.

1) S must contain a 0 vector.
2) If u and v are in S, then u+v is also in S.
3) If r is a real number and u is in S, the ru is also in S.

I am totally lost in applying these steps! I have an idea on how to apply the first one, but even still I don't feel confident in how I am applying it. So once again, I would be eternally grateful for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AngrySnorlax said:
Hey there guys, its AngrySnorlax here again with another problem. I posted here before when I was having an issue and the responses I got were extremely helpful because there was a specific step that I just could not grasp that was explained to me and I am hoping that is the same situation here with these problems.

I am trying to determine how to tell if a set is a subspace. The problem reads like this:
Determine if the described set is a subspace. If so, give a proof. If not, explain why not. Unless stated otherwise, a, b, and c are real numbers.

The subset of {R}^{3} consisting of vectors of the form
$$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right]$$

The answer at the back of the book reads this:
This is a subspace, equal to span
$$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array}\right]$$$$\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{array}\right]$$

Now I am aware that there are three steps, but I am not entirely sure on how to use these steps.

1) S must contain a 0 vector.
2) If u and v are in S, then u+v is also in S.
3) If r is a real number and u is in S, the ru is also in S.

I am totally lost in applying these steps! I have an idea on how to apply the first one, but even still I don't feel confident in how I am applying it. So once again, I would be eternally grateful for any help :)
1) Is there an a, b such that $$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array}\right]$$

2) Let [math]u = \left[\begin{array}{c}c \\ 0 \\ d \end{array}\right] [/math] and [math]v = \left[\begin{array}{c}e \\ 0 \\ f \end{array}\right] [/math]. Is u + v in the form [math]\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right] [/math]?

3) I'll let you figure this out from here. Let us know if you still have troubles.

-Dan
 
I still don't get it. I think I may be over thinking it or I just haven't found the right way to think about it yet.
 
AngrySnorlax said:
I still don't get it. I think I may be over thinking it or I just haven't found the right way to think about it yet.
What are you not getting? Without knowing we are simply guessing as to how to help.

Do you understand that the zero vector is [math]\left [ \begin{matrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ] [/math]? Do you understand that this is expressible as [math]\left [ \begin{matrix} a \\ 0 \\ b \end{matrix} \right ] [/math] for a = b = 0, and is thus a member of the proposed subspace?

-Dan
 
AngrySnorlax said:
Hey there guys, its AngrySnorlax here again with another problem. I posted here before when I was having an issue and the responses I got were extremely helpful because there was a specific step that I just could not grasp that was explained to me and I am hoping that is the same situation here with these problems.

I am trying to determine how to tell if a set is a subspace. The problem reads like this:
Determine if the described set is a subspace. If so, give a proof. If not, explain why not. Unless stated otherwise, a, b, and c are real numbers.

The subset of {R}^{3} consisting of vectors of the form
$$\left[\begin{array}{c}a \\ 0 \\ b \end{array}\right]$$

The answer at the back of the book reads this:
This is a subspace, equal to span
$$\left[\begin{array}{c}1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array}\right]$$$$\left[\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{array}\right]$$

Now I am aware that there are three steps, but I am not entirely sure on how to use these steps.

1) S must contain a 0 vector.
2) If u and v are in S, then u+v is also in S.
3) If r is a real number and u is in S, the ru is also in S.

I am totally lost in applying these steps! I have an idea on how to apply the first one, but even still I don't feel confident in how I am applying it. So once again, I would be eternally grateful for any help :)

The condition (1) may be replaced by $S \neq \emptyset$, because then, given:

$u \in S$, condition (3) implies $-u = (-1)u \in S$, and condition (2) implies that since $u,-u \in S$, so is $u + -u = 0$.

This is worth remembering, and it is clear your set is non-empty, so we really needn't worry overmuch about the 0-vector. Of course, it is fairly clear taking $a = b = 0$, that:

$\begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}$ is of the form $\begin{bmatrix}a\\0\\b\end{bmatrix}$.

The two closure conditions (2) and (3) are far more important. Here is how you would verify (2):

Let $u = \begin{bmatrix}a\\0\\b\end{bmatrix}$ and $v = \begin{bmatrix}a'\\0\\b'\end{bmatrix}$.

Then $u + v = \begin{bmatrix}a\\0\\b\end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix}a'\\0\\b'\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}a+a'\\0\\b+b'\end{bmatrix}$

and clearly $a+a',b+b'$ are real numbers if $a,a',b,b'$ are.

Intuitively, what we mean by $S$, here, is "all 3-vectors with 2nd coordinate zero". Said this way, it is obvious the 0-vector has second coordinate zero (ALL its coordinates are zero, including the second one), and that adding two vectors with second coordinate zero, still leaves the second coordinate zero (because we add "coordinate-to-coordinate"), and that multiplying such a vector by any scalar STILL leaves the second coordinate zero (if our scalar is $r$, the second coordinate will be $r\cdot 0 = 0$).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K