Determining the height an arrow reaches when shot from a bow

  • Thread starter Thread starter otownsend
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the height an arrow reaches when shot from a bow, focusing on the effects of kinetic friction and the interpretation of the problem statement regarding the expected height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different scenarios involving kinetic friction and its impact on the velocity of the arrow. There are questions about the interpretation of the problem statement and the accuracy of the printed answer. Some participants explore the implications of the bow's acceleration on the height achieved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning assumptions about the problem setup. There is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation of the height achieved, but various perspectives are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the answer may have been misinterpreted due to its presentation in the problem statement, and there is a discussion about the distance the arrow rises while being accelerated by the bow, which may not have been accounted for in the initial calculations.

otownsend
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
User reminded to post schoolwork-type questions in the Homework Help forum and to use the Template there
Hi,

I'm trying to attempt the "Try it yourself" on the bottom-right corner of the image attached, but I am struggling.

As you see in the other image I attached, in one scenario I took into account the kinetic friction (which did not lead me anywhere since I needed to know the velocity of the arrow once in the air), and then in another scenario I did not take it into account (which led me to the wrong answer of about 81 meters). The actual answer is 28 meters.

I hope someone can help me solve this question!:/

IMG_20181112_132541.jpg

IMG_20181112_132416.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181112_132541.jpg
    IMG_20181112_132541.jpg
    51.1 KB · Views: 888
  • IMG_20181112_132416.jpg
    IMG_20181112_132416.jpg
    44.2 KB · Views: 774
Physics news on Phys.org
otownsend said:
Hi,

I'm trying to attempt the "Try it yourself" on the bottom-right corner of the image attached, but I am struggling.

As you see in the other image I attached, in one scenario I took into account the kinetic friction (which did not lead me anywhere since I needed to know the velocity of the arrow once in the air), and then in another scenario I did not take it into account (which led me to the wrong answer of about 81 meters). The actual answer is 28 meters.

I hope someone can help me solve this question!:/

View attachment 233862
View attachment 233863
Actually, in the problem statement, the answer is printed upside down. Take another look at it. You interpreted it as 28m, but it is actually 82m.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
tnich said:
the answer is printed upside down.
Amazing that this apparently worked here!
 
The height achieved should actually be just a tad less than what they gave since they failed to take into account the distance the arrow rose while being accelerated by the bow.
 
gneill said:
The height achieved should actually be just a tad less than what they gave since they failed to take into account the distance the arrow rose while being accelerated by the bow.
Doesn't that cancel out? Yes, it made the launch speed a little less but that matches the contribution made to the eventual height. Essentially, initial stored energy equals GPE achieved.
 
haruspex said:
Doesn't that cancel out? Yes, it made the launch speed a little less but that matches the contribution made to the eventual height. Essentially, initial stored energy equals GPE achieved.
I suppose, If you count the distance of the bow stretch as part of the height achieved. I was thinking that the height desired was the height achieved by the projectile after launch.
 
Oh wow -_______- sorry about not turning my head properly side-ways... I'll be more careful next time before I make a post.
 
otownsend said:
Oh wow -_______- sorry about not turning my head properly side-ways... I'll be more careful next time before I make a post.
Hah!. Sideways wouldn't do in this case. Completely upside down is the necessary contortion. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K