Determining the mass of Pluto using its moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Softshow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Moon Pluto
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of Pluto can be determined through the observation of its moon, Charon, which was discovered on June 22, 1978, by James Christy. The calculation relies on the radius of Charon's orbit and its orbital period, as both factors are essential in applying Newton's law of gravitation. The gravitational force exerted by Pluto on Charon is proportional to Pluto's mass, allowing for accurate mass estimation when the orbital characteristics are known. It is crucial to clarify that gravitational force, not gravity alone, is the relevant quantity in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of gravitation
  • Knowledge of orbital mechanics, specifically semi-major axes and orbital periods
  • Familiarity with gravitational force calculations
  • Basic concepts of celestial mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's law of gravitation in celestial mechanics
  • Learn how to calculate gravitational force using orbital radius and period
  • Research the methods for determining mass of celestial bodies using their moons
  • Explore the historical context of Pluto's discovery and its implications in astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and educators interested in celestial mechanics and the methods for calculating the mass of celestial bodies using their moons.

Softshow
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On June 22, 1978, James Christy made the first observation of a moon orbiting Pluto. Until then, the mass of Pluto was not known, but with the discover of its moon, Charon, its mass could be calculated with some accuracy. Explain.


2. The attempt at a solution
"By knowing how large the orbit of the moon was, the mass of pluto could be calculated. In order to do this, the radius of the orbit of the moon is used because it shows the amount of gravity pluto is exerting on it. Because mass is proportional to gravity, and gravity to the size of the orbit, the mass can be calculated by looking at the size of the orbit."

I was given 4/5 credit for this with no direction as to where I went astray. I'm not sure if I was just too vague or I was simply incorrect, but any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless you explain what you did, how could anyone here find out where you went wrong?
 
Sorry I didn't explain this better, this was not given as a mathematical problem, instead it was a problem which we were expected to try and talk through. No numerical values were given, making it completely impossible to actually determine the mass of pluto. We were simply expected to demonstrate our knowledge of the concepts at work relating to this problem.
 
I don't think the size of the orbit is the only factor. The period also has to be in there somewhere I believe.
 
Gravity is not "proportional to the size of the orbit". Jupiter has moons with semi-major axes ranging from ~128,000 km to over 30 million km. The Earth has man-made satellites that orbit just a few hundred km above the surface (semi-major axis ~6700 km), geostationary satellites orbiting at 42,164 km, and of course the Moon at ~385,000 km.
 
One thing I have a problem with is your references to "gravity" as if it were a specific quantity:
"amount of gravity pluto is exerting on it" and "Because mass is proportional to gravity". I presume you mean "gravitational force" but you should still tell how one could determine the gravitational force the size or period of an orbit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K