Determining the mass of Pluto using its moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Softshow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Moon Pluto
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the mass of Pluto using its moon, Charon, based on gravitational principles and orbital mechanics. Participants explore the relationship between the orbit of Charon and the gravitational influence of Pluto.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the importance of the orbit's radius and period in calculating Pluto's mass. There are questions about the adequacy of the original explanation regarding gravitational concepts and the factors involved in the calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the original explanation and exploring different aspects of gravitational force and orbital mechanics. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of numerical values in the problem, which complicates the ability to determine Pluto's mass directly. There is also a mention of the expectation to discuss concepts rather than solve a mathematical problem.

Softshow
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On June 22, 1978, James Christy made the first observation of a moon orbiting Pluto. Until then, the mass of Pluto was not known, but with the discover of its moon, Charon, its mass could be calculated with some accuracy. Explain.


2. The attempt at a solution
"By knowing how large the orbit of the moon was, the mass of pluto could be calculated. In order to do this, the radius of the orbit of the moon is used because it shows the amount of gravity pluto is exerting on it. Because mass is proportional to gravity, and gravity to the size of the orbit, the mass can be calculated by looking at the size of the orbit."

I was given 4/5 credit for this with no direction as to where I went astray. I'm not sure if I was just too vague or I was simply incorrect, but any input would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless you explain what you did, how could anyone here find out where you went wrong?
 
Sorry I didn't explain this better, this was not given as a mathematical problem, instead it was a problem which we were expected to try and talk through. No numerical values were given, making it completely impossible to actually determine the mass of pluto. We were simply expected to demonstrate our knowledge of the concepts at work relating to this problem.
 
I don't think the size of the orbit is the only factor. The period also has to be in there somewhere I believe.
 
Gravity is not "proportional to the size of the orbit". Jupiter has moons with semi-major axes ranging from ~128,000 km to over 30 million km. The Earth has man-made satellites that orbit just a few hundred km above the surface (semi-major axis ~6700 km), geostationary satellites orbiting at 42,164 km, and of course the Moon at ~385,000 km.
 
One thing I have a problem with is your references to "gravity" as if it were a specific quantity:
"amount of gravity pluto is exerting on it" and "Because mass is proportional to gravity". I presume you mean "gravitational force" but you should still tell how one could determine the gravitational force the size or period of an orbit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K