Determining where I'm competitive

  • Context: Admissions 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a student seeking advice on graduate school applications in physics and nuclear engineering. The participant shares their academic background, research experiences, and schools of interest, while soliciting feedback on their competitiveness and suggestions for improving their application.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) outlines their academic achievements, including a high GPA and relevant research experiences, and asks for advice on their chances of admission to various graduate programs.
  • Some participants suggest that internships are crucial for standing out in graduate assistant positions and that the OP's professional experience may qualify as such if credited by their university.
  • There is an emphasis on the importance of writing and communication skills in the US academic environment, with a suggestion that publishing work can enhance future opportunities.
  • One participant recommends Texas A&M for its strong nuclear engineering program, highlighting its facilities and focus areas.
  • The OP expresses a preference for exploring other aspects of nuclear technology while acknowledging the suggestion about Texas A&M.
  • Another participant clarifies the GPA scale and its implications for honors designations, confirming the OP's GPA aligns with cum laude standards.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of internships and communication skills for graduate applications, but there are varying opinions on specific schools and programs to consider. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best strategies for the OP's application.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding how the OP's GPA will be evaluated by different institutions, and the discussion does not resolve the specifics of how to enhance the OP's application further.

Who May Find This Useful

Students preparing for graduate school applications in physics or engineering, particularly those interested in nuclear engineering and related fields.

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
(My apologies if this is the wrong place to post such a topic.)

I'm finishing up my bachelor's in physics and I'll be applying to grad schools this upcoming year. One part of that is of course choosing which schools to even apply to. I've looked into quite a few different schools and have been searching/communicating with different research groups just to get a feel for what they look for and expect from applicants and also the type of work they do. Right now, I plan on applying to a few MSc programs across Canada and a couple PhD programs in Nuclear Engineering in the states (I will be writing the GRE soon). Now before I get ahead of myself, I think I should still determine where I have a decent chance of getting in before applying. So if you have any advice given my information below, that would be greatly appreciated!

I am a Canadian citizen. Attend Western University and am completing a BSc in Physics.

GPA:
Year 1 - 3.99
Year 2 - 3.91
Year 3 - 3.87

I did a brief research project during my first year on medical imaging/neuroscience. No publication and I was just helping out in a fairly minor role. I also worked on a particle detector in a prior summer involving some computation work which was quite successful and fairly fun (but still no publication which we never really intended to do; although I got a couple poster presentation awards if it's important). I am also now working on a project in astronomy that will lead into my honours thesis which I think will be a great experience.

I also have quite a bit of professional and volunteer experience working in medical (e.g. hospitals, clinics) and veterinary (e.g. small animals, wildlife rehab) capacities. I also believe I have strong references from both professors and supervisors. I've also applied for a lot of scholarships/grants in my undergrad and fortunately won a few of them. I'm not sure how much of a bearing these experiences and awards will have on my application, but hopefully it will give you better idea of my overall application. (If there's any further info you think would be pertinent to assessing my chances, feel free to let me know.)

After checking out these schools across Canada and different research groups at each one, I will likely be applying to: UofT, Waterloo, UBC, and McGill for their MSc in Physics. I'll be writing the general GRE soon and plan to apply to the states this upcoming year for graduate programs, too, but namely PhD programs in nuclear engineering. In the states, I have heard good things about Purdue, University of Michigan, and UC Berkley. Thus far, I'm planning to apply the schools mentioned above along with a few backup options. Given my background and experiences, do you think these are feasible schools? Anything in particular you would recommend to improve my application?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I worked for several years in Career Services at a major university in Texas, and it was not Texas A&M. However, I believe it should be on your list. They have an excellent nuclear engineering department with two reactors, seven accelerators, and also have emphases in nuclear health technology, which is something I noticed in your post.

Internships will be vital for standing out in consideration in graduate assistant positions in the US. Your professional experience may qualify as an internship if you are able to get your university to grant credit for it as such, and it relates to your pursuit. Otherwise I would begin working on obtaining some now, if you haven't done so. Curriculum vitae are not used as much in the US for general employment and internships but are in the academic world here.

Of course writing is very important as well. There has been a strong focus in the US over the last 20 years on communication skills since many US graduates haven't been able to communicate adequately. Publish or perish is a reality, and the more you write and cite now the better off you will be later.

With your cum laude/magna cum laude region GPA (provided you did not just state your major GPA) you should have no problem obtaining internships or graduate assistant positions.
 
johnnyrev said:
I worked for several years in Career Services at a major university in Texas, and it was not Texas A&M. However, I believe it should be on your list. They have an excellent nuclear engineering department with two reactors, seven accelerators, and also have emphases in nuclear health technology, which is something I noticed in your post.

Internships will be vital for standing out in consideration in graduate assistant positions in the US. Your professional experience may qualify as an internship if you are able to get your university to grant credit for it as such, and it relates to your pursuit. Otherwise I would begin working on obtaining some now, if you haven't done so. Curriculum vitae are not used as much in the US for general employment and internships but are in the academic world here.

Of course writing is very important as well. There has been a strong focus in the US over the last 20 years on communication skills since many US graduates haven't been able to communicate adequately. Publish or perish is a reality, and the more you write and cite now the better off you will be later.

With your cum laude/magna cum laude region GPA (provided you did not just state your major GPA) you should have no problem obtaining internships or graduate assistant positions.

Thank you for the input! I'm actually a bit more interested in the others aspects of nuclear technology at this time although I'll definitely look into Texas A&M. Yes, that is my overall gpa according to this http://www.ouac.on.ca/docs/omsas/c_omsas_b.pdf . I'm not too sure how gpa would be converted from my university, but I'd expect something similar.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: johnnyrev
We use the typical GPA scale you mentioned in your OP, 0.00-4.00. 3.85 is generally the cutoff for cum laude, although individual colleges differ. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K