News Did Scott Brown's Win Signal a Shift in American Political Landscape?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Republican Scott Brown has won the Massachusetts Senate seat previously held by Democrats, defeating Martha Coakley with 53% of the vote. This election is seen as a significant shift in political sentiment, reflecting voter dissatisfaction with President Obama's policies and the Democratic agenda. The loss jeopardizes the Democrats' supermajority in the Senate, complicating efforts to pass key legislation, particularly healthcare reform. Analysts suggest that this outcome indicates a potential Republican resurgence in upcoming elections, especially if unemployment remains high. The election results signal a broader rejection of liberal policies, highlighting a center-right inclination among American voters.
  • #61
As a great man once said, "A man never lost money betting against the intelligence of the American voter."

I say "a great man" because I can't remember who said it. If it turns out to be someone like Hitler,
I'm sorry.

However, IMHO, the point is correct, and "IMHO" should always follow and be followed by a comma.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
I thought this was interesting.

MS. VALERIE JARRETT said:
Look, the fact of the matter is, you're right, it was a stunning victory. But the people in Massachusetts already have healthcare reform. In fact, Senator Brown voted for the healthcare reform that Massachusetts has. He said he wouldn't vote to repeal it...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35014151/ns/meet_the_press/ns/meet_the_press

So maybe this really was about health care after all. :biggrin: Massachusetts already has universal health care and Brown supports it.
 
  • #63
You mean he supported. Joseph Loserman... er, I mean Lieberman used to support health care too.

I'm no Democrat, but Joe Lieberman (and Arlen Specter, to be fair) sickens me. Can you guess why?
 
  • #64
Char. Limit said:
You mean he supported. Joseph Loserman... er, I mean Lieberman used to support health care too.

I'm no Democrat, but Joe Lieberman (and Arlen Specter, to be fair) sickens me. Can you guess why?
No, but the anticipation is killing me. :!)
 
  • #65
Ivan Seeking said:
I thought this was interesting.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35014151/ns/meet_the_press/ns/meet_the_press

So maybe this really was about health care after all. :biggrin: Massachusetts already has universal health care and Brown supports it.

Healthcare was definitely one of the issues involved. Brown's position is that universal healthcare that covers basic healthcare needs should be a state issue, like public education, not something the national government handles.

Brown says that Massachusetts should reform its healthcare program and make it a model so that other states can copy it (although from what I have read it has too many problems to be copied anytime soon though).
 
  • #66
Nebula815 said:
Healthcare was definitely one of the issues involved. Brown's position is that universal healthcare that covers basic healthcare needs should be a state issue, like public education, not something the national government handles.
A believer in constitutional federalism elected in a Massachusetts election?! To Kennedy's seat? I know I'm dreaming all this now. :smile:

I guess I have no choice but to rethink what I [STRIKE]think[/STRIKE] thought about [STRIKE]The People's Republic of[/STRIKE] Massachusetts. :!)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K