Did the Saudis save the world from a major terror attack?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of Saudi intelligence in potentially preventing a terrorist attack involving mail bombs. Participants explore the implications of this event in the context of accusations against Saudi Arabia regarding state sponsorship of terrorism, and the moral standing of the Saudi regime.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants credit Saudi intelligence for providing a tip that may have prevented a major terrorist attack, suggesting a need for recognition of their role.
  • Others question the motivations behind the Saudi government's actions, implying that the intelligence may be part of a broader political narrative.
  • There are claims that the accusations of Saudi Arabia being a state sponsor of terrorism are held by various political factions, including some on the right and left.
  • Some participants express strong moral objections to the Saudi regime, citing practices such as stoning, and argue that this undermines any recognition of their actions in preventing terrorism.
  • There is a discussion about the moral equivalence of different countries' actions, with some participants attempting to compare the severity of human rights violations across nations.
  • One participant suggests that many countries could be found guilty of similar offenses, raising questions about the consistency of moral judgments applied to different regimes.
  • Another participant challenges the idea of moral equivalence, emphasizing the severity of specific punishments in Saudi Arabia compared to historical events in other countries.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus. There are competing views on the recognition of Saudi actions, the moral implications of their regime, and the validity of accusations against them regarding terrorism.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various political perspectives and historical contexts, but there is no resolution on the moral standing of the Saudi regime or the implications of their intelligence actions.

  • #31
BobG said:
Both have a significant factor in common - a more progressive ruler (progressive by Saudi Arabia standards - in fact, actually he's referred to as a "cautious reformer").
Cautious reformer to some; repressive dictator to others. Abdullah has been averaging around #5 for the last decade or so, in Parade Magazine's 10 Worst Dictators list.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K