Did Tsar bomba explosion seen in Finland ?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eldorado
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Tsar Bomba explosion, the largest nuclear device detonated in 1961, produced a fireball with a diameter of 8 km. Observations indicated that the fireball was seen and felt nearly 1,000 kilometers from ground zero, despite the calculated height of the fireball being insufficient for visibility at that distance. The discussion highlights the distance-to-horizon problem, concluding that observers in Finland likely saw a flash due to atmospheric effects or the illumination of high-level clouds rather than the fireball itself. The blast wave from the explosion was recorded three times as it circled the Earth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly distance-to-horizon calculations.
  • Familiarity with the Tsar Bomba and its specifications, including its yield of 57 megatons.
  • Knowledge of atmospheric phenomena, including light reflection and ionization effects.
  • Basic comprehension of nuclear weapon history and its implications.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "distance-to-horizon calculations" in physics for better understanding.
  • Explore articles on "atmospheric ionization effects" and their visibility implications.
  • Study the "history and impact of Tsar Bomba" to grasp its significance in nuclear testing.
  • Investigate "light reflection in high-altitude clouds" to understand visual phenomena related to explosions.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, historians, and anyone interested in nuclear weapons, atmospheric science, or the historical context of the Tsar Bomba explosion.

eldorado
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello :)

When I read about Tsar Bomba, I find that all sites say "The fireball touched the ground, reached nearly as high as the altitude of the release plane and was seen and felt almost 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) from ground zero."

Diameter of the fireball is 8 km.

Now , there are some premises :

1 Distance between the explosion & point that fireball seen is 1,000 km.
2 Circumference of the Earth is about 40000 km.
3 Angle between the two lines which passes through center of the Earth & ( ground zero & 1000 km point ) = (1000/40000)*360 = 9 degrees.
4 Sight line of 1000 km point is the tangent of the earth.
5 To see the explosion from 1000 km point , fire must be at least 79.5 km high.

this conclusion came from:

height of the fire to be seen 1000 km far = ( Radius of the Earth / Cos (9 degrees ) ) - Radius of the earth.so , how could the explosion seen from this distance when the height of the fire is only 8 km ?

thanks for help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is essentialy a distance-to-horizon problem - but the other way around
Imagine an observer at the top of cloud looking to a point on the ground in finland

Distance to the horizon is roughly sqrt( 13*h ), with h in metres
So if h is 8km, 8000m, the horizon is = 320 km, so no you can't see the cloud directly.

You might have seen a flash due to the explosion illuminating high level clouds and reflecting the light, or some atmopsheric effect of exciting ions in some upper level.
 
Tsar Bomba was a 57 megaton hydrogen-bomb (which was decimated from its originally intended size of 100 megaton by removing material) and it is the largest device ever detonated on this Earth (at least in atmosphere). In 1961. Everybody got the message. Yes, it was reported as seen in Finland. And the blast wave was recorded three times (it circulated the earth). OK, so we know that you can blow it all up. So what? What now? Let's talk.
 
You might have seen a flash due to the explosion illuminating high level clouds and reflecting the light, or some atmopsheric effect of exciting ions in some upper level.

Thanks a lot for help :)

could you guide me to articles about this effect of illumination & the atmospheric ions ?

Thanks a lot :)
 
The diameter of the fireball might have been only 8 km, but I'm sure it didn't just chill there until it disappeared. I wouldn't be surprised if it rose to pretty close to the height that you calculated, where it could have been seen from Finland...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K