Differences between perturbation/variation of an object?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter troglodyte
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of "perturbation" and "variation" in the context of physical systems. Participants explore the definitions, implications, and differences between these terms, touching on theoretical and practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether perturbing a system is equivalent to varying it, seeking a clear explanation.
  • Another participant describes perturbation as changing parameters that define a system's state, providing an example involving water flow rates.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that perturbation leads to a change from an initial to a final state, implying that variation requires perturbation, thus arguing the concepts are not equivalent.
  • Some participants differentiate between the types of quantities perturbed, noting that variational problems involve geometrical objects while perturbation theory deals with physical quantities.
  • One participant cautions against conflating the term "perturbation" in perturbation theory with the general act of perturbing, suggesting it has a distinct meaning.
  • Another participant proposes that "variation" typically involves random components, while "perturbation" refers to planned changes, though they acknowledge the lack of official rules governing these terms.
  • Concerns are raised about the inconsistent use of "perturbation" in literature, with participants noting that many sources fail to define the term clearly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of perturbation and variation, with no consensus reached on their definitions or applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise distinctions between the terms.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the literature regarding the definitions of perturbation and variation, indicating a lack of consistency in terminology and usage across different contexts.

troglodyte
Gold Member
Messages
31
Reaction score
22
Hello Guys,

everyone use the word "perturbation" but no one explain it in a consist manner .So,If I perturb a system it is equivalent to vary a system?
Maybe someone can explain it to me in a clear way .

Thank You,
troglodyte
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You perform a perturbation on a system if you change some parameters that define the state of the system. For example, imagine you are measuring the water flow rate outside of a tank. If you add some water to the tank or if you change the pressure inside the vessel, or if you change the dimension of the hole where the water flows out, you are perturbing the system which you were studying before and in fact the outcome of the new measurement (of the water flow rate) will be different from before.

In physics the world "perturbation" may also refer to the technique known as "perturbation theory".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: troglodyte
..which means through a perturbation of a system i change the state of system from an initial state to a final state.Therefore, to vary a system one needs a perturbation.So, both concepts are not not equivalent.There exist a kind of implication from perturbation theory to variational theory. Not vice a versa, right?
 
Last edited:
I think one difference are the quantities which I perturb .In variational problems i perturb geometrical objects like curves ,areas..On the other hand ,in perturbation theory the perturbed objects are physical quantities of the systems, which I definitely know.
 
troglodyte said:
..which means through a perturbation of a system i change the state of system from an initial state to a final state.T
The perturbed state is not necessarily the final state.

Consider a ball initially at the bottom of a valley. We perturb it by moving it away from the bottom, then let go. In the final state it returns to the bottom. The goal of the problem might be to see whether or not it returns to the initial state.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: troglodyte
troglodyte said:
in perturbation theory the perturbed objects are physical quantities of the systems, which I definitely know.
Hold on, I didn't say that perturbation theory is about perturbing stuff... In fact this is a pretty misleading way to put it. The word "perturbation" in "perturbation theory" has a different meaning. I just said that so that you don't confuse those terms but apparently it backfired
 
The term "variation" is generally used when there is a random component that causes random variations. The term "perturbation" is generally used there is a planned, hypothesized, or one-time, change to a system. But I do not think that there is an official rule that applies.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
FactChecker said:
The term "variation" is generally used when there is a random component that causes random variations. The term "perturbation" is generally used there is a planned, hypothesized, or one-time, change to a system. But I do not think that there is an official rule that applies.
I think that makes sense and it's how I would look at things.
We're into that region of classification of terms again.
If you are searching then, rather than risk missing out on some information because the title / summary of a source may not be following the name convention, look deeper into any document before rejecting it merely on the basis of the use of one or other of those terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
sophiecentaur said:
look deeper into any document before rejecting it merely on the basis of the use of one or other of those terms.
Maybe you have a good reference.As I have stated before.The literature is not consistent in this case .Most of them uses the word "perturbation"but without introducing the concept and without telling what they concretely mean by this.
 
  • #10
troglodyte said:
Maybe you have a good reference.As I have stated before.The literature is not consistent in this case .Most of them uses the word "perturbation"but without introducing the concept and without telling what they concretely mean by this.
So there is not a consistent use of the word. The next question is, what is the scenario in which you are seeing the word used? That should determine how it is being used.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
852
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K