Different invariant tori in the case of a 2D harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences in invariant tori when analyzing a 2D simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) using polar versus Cartesian coordinate systems. It is established that these coordinate choices lead to distinct action-angle variables and non-diffeomorphic invariant tori, specifically represented as ##S^1 \times S^1##. The conversation highlights the decoupling of the 2D SHO into two independent 1D SHO systems, resulting in a toroidal structure in the composite phase space. The implications of perturbations on the topology of these orbits are also examined, particularly concerning the determinant condition of the action-angle variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic oscillators (SHO)
  • Familiarity with action-angle variables in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of phase space concepts and topology
  • Basic grasp of tensor analysis and coordinate transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the non-diffeomorphic nature of invariant tori in 2D SHO systems
  • Explore the implications of perturbations on the topology of phase space orbits
  • Investigate the role of action-angle variables in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Learn about the diagonalization of elasticity tensors in multi-dimensional systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of classical mechanics interested in the dynamics of harmonic oscillators and the implications of coordinate transformations on invariant tori.

Lo Scrondo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

Both sources I'm currently reading (page 291 of Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics by Arnol'd - get it here - and page 202 of Classical Mechanics by Shapiro - here) say that, in the case of the planar harmonic oscillator, using polar or cartesian coordinate systems leads to different action-angle variables (and I'm ok with that) and different invariant tori.

I think I've understood in what sense those tori could be different (i.e. not diffeomorphic at all), but I'd be very glad to see a proof (which I found nowhere) or even an insight...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These tori (##S^1\times S^1##) reflect the decoupling of the two dimensional (counting configuration variables) simple harmonic oscillator (SHO). In the general case your elasticity will be a 2-tensor but it can be diagonalized via a choice of oblique coordinates which will decouple the system...

This is to say we can treat the 2-dim SHO as two independent 1-dim SHO's, and the composite system description will then be the Cartesian product of the two independent descriptions (initial conditions plus factored component dynamics).

Recalling that the orbit of a single 1-dim SHO in phase space (1+1 dim) is a circle (topologically speaking) then the orbit of the 2-dim SHO becomes a circle ##\times## circle i.e. a torus in the 2+2 dimensional composite phase space.

One can then also infer that under small perturbations from the 2-dim SHO via introduction of small coupling dynamics between the otherwise independent components, the orbits shold not significantly alter and preserve their topology although the geometric shape will be deformed in the 4-dim phase space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lo Scrondo and vanhees71
Many thanks for your insight @jambaugh!
My concern was about the following fact. Let's say, in the case of the 2D SHO, we got a couple of action-angle variables, ##I_1, \omega_1## and ##I_2, \omega_2##.
Now, let $$det (\frac{\partial \omega_n}{\partial I_n}) = 0$$This means that the torus created by the trajectories is in fact 1-dimensional.
If we got different action-angle variables, will such torus be the same or at least homotopically equivalent?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
666
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K