Differential Equation with Function of Shifted Variable

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation involving a function of a shifted variable, specifically f(t-1) instead of f(t). Participants explore various approaches to this type of equation, which is identified as a delay-differential equation. The conversation includes inquiries about existing literature and methods for solving such equations, as well as examples of potential solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using Leibnitz notation and changing variables to facilitate solving the equation, but another challenges this approach, indicating it leads to a "differential-difference" equation that can be complex to solve.
  • A later reply proposes solving the equation numerically for a specific initial function value, recommending the Euler method for a given interval.
  • Another participant mentions that a solution of the equation can be expressed using the Lambert W function, noting that such equations with shifted variables are not common in physics due to their description of non-local dynamics.
  • There is a discussion about the need for initial values over intervals rather than at specific points, with an example provided to illustrate how to approach the problem incrementally.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to solving the equation, with some advocating for numerical methods while others focus on analytical solutions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective method to tackle the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of "differential-difference" equations and the potential challenges in finding solutions, particularly when initial conditions are defined over intervals. There is also mention of the specific nature of the solutions involving the Lambert W function.

Gackhammer
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I have a question for you... how would one go about solving an equation like this...

gif.gif
or this...

gif.gif
This came across my mind the other day. I was wondering how to solve that equation if the function is of t-1, instead of t. Obviously, if it was f(t), the solution would be Ce^t, but I was wondering if there is a way to find stuff for f(t-1).

Is there any literature that would help lead meh into da right direction? Obviously my title doesn't do much justice, so I wanted to know if stuff like this has already been dun before!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easier to work in Leibnitz notation: $$\frac{d}{dt}y(t)=y(t-1)$$ I'd change the variable ...##\small x=t-1\Rightarrow t=x+1\Rightarrow dt/dx = 1## - multiply both sides by ##\small dt/dx##: $$\frac{dy}{dt}\frac{dt}{dx} = y(x)\frac{dt}{dx}$$
----------------------
niggle: for clarity, the prime goes with the function and not the operand thus: ##y^\prime(t)## and not ##y(t)^\prime##
 
I am not sure what you are suggesting with this. If you are suggesting that the left side becomes
dy/dx so that, since dt/dx= 1, dy/dx(x)= y(x), you are mistaken. With the change of variable, this becomes dy/dx(x+1)= y(x). Either way, this is a "differential-difference" equation which can be very difficult to solve.

Typically, rather than an "initial value" at specific value of t, the initial value is over an interval, say 0 to 1, and you can solve the equation "interval by interval".

For example, if we are given that f(t)= t for t in [0, 1], then, for t between 1 and 2, the equation is f'(t)= t-1 so that f(t)= t^2/2- t+ C. Since f is continuous at t= 1, we have f(1)= 1= 1/2- 1+ C so that C= 2- 1/2= 3/2. f(t)= t^2- t+ 3/2 for t in [1, 2].

For t in [1, 2], [itex]f'(t)= (t-1)^2- (t-1)+ 3/2= t^2- 3t+ 7/2[/itex]. Integrating, [itex]f(t)= (1/3)t^3- (3/2)t^2+ (7/2)t+ C[/itex]. Since f is continuous at t= 2, [itex]f(2)= 4- 2+ 3/2= 7/2= 8/3- 6+ 7+ C[/itex] so that C= -11/3. [itex]f(t)= (1/3)t^3- (3/2)t^2+ (7/2)t- 11/3[/itex] for x in [1, 2]

Continue like that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Gackhammer said:
Hey guys, I have a question for you... how would one go about solving an equation like this...

gif.gif



or this...

gif.gif



This came across my mind the other day. I was wondering how to solve that equation if the function is of t-1, instead of t. Obviously, if it was f(t), the solution would be Ce^t, but I was wondering if there is a way to find stuff for f(t-1).

Is there any literature that would help lead meh into da right direction? Obviously my title doesn't do much justice, so I wanted to know if stuff like this has already been dun before!

Thanks!

That's a delay-differential equation. You can look that up. You can solve this one numerically for a particular initial function value in the interval (-1,0) for example, y(t)=t+1. We'd then solve:

[tex]y'(t)=y(t-1),\quad y(t)=t+1, t\in [-1,0][/tex]

Now, try and use the Euler method to solve that IVP for say t=0 to 5. Just a suggestion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
One solution of the equation ##f'(x)=f(x-1)## is ##f(x)=e^{W(1)x}##, where ##W(x)## is the Lambert W function. Also that solution multiplied by any constant is a solution.

That kind of DE:s with a shifted variable don't appear much in physics, as they describe non-local dynamics.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I am not sure what you are suggesting with this. If you are suggesting that the left side becomes
dy/dx so that, since dt/dx= 1, dy/dx(x)= y(x), you are mistaken. With the change of variable, this becomes dy/dx(x+1)= y(x). Either way, this is a "differential-difference" equation which can be very difficult to solve.
Yeah - I stuffed up :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K