Differentiating semi-classical Kubo trans. correlation functions wrt t

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of non-local correlation functions from local ones in the context of semi-classical Kubo transport theory. Specifically, it examines the transition from equation 21 to equation 23 in the paper by Miller, highlighting the role of the Heisenberg-picture operator and time-translation invariance of the Hamiltonian (H). The process involves differentiating the correlation function with respect to time and applying time-translation invariance to manipulate the terms, ultimately proving equation 20.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semi-classical Kubo transport theory
  • Familiarity with Heisenberg-picture operators
  • Knowledge of time-translation invariance in quantum mechanics
  • Basic proficiency in differential calculus applied to physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of correlation functions in quantum statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of time-translation invariance in quantum systems
  • Explore advanced topics in semi-classical transport theory
  • Review the mathematical techniques used in the paper by Miller, particularly equations 20-23
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and statistical physics, as well as researchers interested in transport phenomena and correlation functions in quantum systems.

jelathome
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I do not fully understand how non local correlation functions are derived from the differentiation of local ones. Specifically how in the following paper equation 23 is derived from 21 since the paper implies H and dpdq are invariant under time.

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~ch10/Papers/Miller_2.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the RHS of eq.(21), the only place ##t## appears is in the factor of ##\bar q_t##; this is the Heisenberg-picture operator ##\bar q## evaluated at time ##t##. The time derivative of ##\bar q_t## is ##\bar v_t##. So ##(d/dt)\tilde c_{qq}(t)## is given by the RHS of eq.(21), but with ##\bar q_t## replaced with ##\bar v_t##.

Next, we use time-translation invariance of ##H## and the integration measure to replace ##\bar q_0\bar v_t## with ##\bar q_{-t}\bar v_0##.

Now we differentiate with respect to ##t## again; this gives ##(d/dt)^2 c_{qq}(t)##. The factor of ##\bar q_{-t}## becomes ##-\bar v_{-t}##.

Finally, time translate again to replace ##\bar v_{-t}\bar v_0## with ##\bar v_0\bar v_t##.

This proves eq.(20).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
12K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K