I do not fully understand how non local correlation functions are derived from the differentiation of local ones. Specifically how in the following paper equation 23 is derived from 21 since the paper implies H and dpdq are invariant under time.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~ch10/Papers/Miller_2.pdf

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Differentiating semi-classical Kubo trans. correlation functions wrt t

Loading...

Similar Threads - Differentiating semi classical | Date |
---|---|

A Models in QM | Feb 12, 2018 |

A Berry phase and parallel transport | Jan 6, 2018 |

I What's the geometric interpretation of the trace of a matrix | Sep 3, 2016 |

I Hamiltonian, differentiation | Jun 21, 2016 |

Double-slit with semi-transparence | Dec 1, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**