MHB Digit sum rule for the divisibility by 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divisibility Sum
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $n\in \mathbb{N}$, $2\leq m\in \mathbb{N}$ and $a\in \mathbb{Z}$.

I want to show that $a\left (m+1\right )^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a$.

I have done the following:
\begin{equation*}a\left (m+1\right )^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a\left (0+1\right )^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a\cdot 1^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a\end{equation*}

Is this correct? Or do we need more details at each step? (Wondering)

After that, using the above, I want to show that \begin{equation*}\forall a_0, a_1, \ldots ,a_k\in \mathbb{Z} : \ \sum_{i=0}^ka_i10^i\overset{(9)}{\equiv}\sum_{i=0}^ka_i\end{equation*} Considering the previous result for the case $m=9$ we get:
$a(9+1)^n\overset{(9)}{\equiv}a \Rightarrow a\cdot 10^n\overset{(9)}{\equiv}a$ for $n\in \mathbb{N}$.

Let $a_0, a_1, \ldots ,a_k\in \mathbb{Z}$.

It holds the following:
\begin{equation*}\sum_{i=0}^ka_i10^i\overset{(9)}{\equiv}\sum_{i=0}^ka_i\end{equation*}
Right? (Wondering) Then how can we get from this result the digit sum rule for the divisibility of a natural number by $9$, if we consider the case $0\leq a_0, a_1, \ldots , a_k<10$ ? Could you give me a hint? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your last step is correct because every a_i is less than 10 and 10= 9+ 1. So a_i(10)= a_i(9+ 1)= a_i modulo 9. The answer to your last question follows immediately from that equation: since \sum a_i 10^i= \sum a_i, modulo 9, the left side is evenly divisible by 9 if and only if the right side is: if and only if the sum of digits is a multiple of 9.
 
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let $n\in \mathbb{N}$, $2\leq m\in \mathbb{N}$ and $a\in \mathbb{Z}$.

I want to show that $a\left (m+1\right )^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a$.

I have done the following:
\begin{equation*}a\left (m+1\right )^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a\left (0+1\right )^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a\cdot 1^n \overset{(9)}{\equiv} a\end{equation*}

Is this correct? Or do we need more details at each step?

Hey mathmari!

It doesn't look correct to me. (Worried)

Suppose we pick $a=3,\,m=2,\,n=1$, then we would get $3(2+1)^1=9\overset{(9)}{\equiv} 3$, but this is not true is it?

Did you perhaps mean divisibility by $m$? (Wondering)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
996
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top