Dimension Check of Einstein's Field Equations

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bentmol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field field equations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the dimensional analysis of Einstein's field equations, specifically addressing the challenges posed by the common practice of setting constants like c and G to 1. The analysis reveals that the diagonal terms in the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar possess dimensions of inverse length squared. Furthermore, it concludes that the diagonal elements of the Robertson Walker metric tensor should be dimensionless, while certain terms exhibit dimensions of squared length, highlighting the dependency of metric tensor components on the chosen coordinate system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's field equations
  • Familiarity with the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar
  • Knowledge of metric tensors in general relativity
  • Basic concepts of dimensional analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of setting constants like c and G to 1 in theoretical physics
  • Explore the properties and applications of the Ricci tensor in general relativity
  • Learn about the Robertson Walker metric and its significance in cosmology
  • Investigate dimensional analysis techniques in advanced physics contexts
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of Einstein's field equations and their dimensional properties.

bentmol
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is my first post in Physics Forums.

I am trying to a dimensional check of Einstein's field equations. Unfortunately, most books consider c = 1 or sometimes even G = c = 1, when presenting the field equations. This makes it very difficult to do a dimensional check.

In spite of this, I think that I have found the dimensions of the diagonal terms in the Ricci tensor. They all seem to be inverse length squared. The terms in the Ricci scalar too seem to have the same dimensions, inverse length squared.

This means that the Robertson Walker metric tensor's diagonal elements should be dimensionless. But the last 2 diagonal terms in the metric tensor are a^2*r^2 and a^2*r^2*sin^2(theta). Clearly, they have the dimension squared length, whereas the first diagonal term -1 has no units and the second diagonal term a^2/(1-k*r^2) too has no units. (a is dimensionless, k has the dimension inverse length squared and r has the dimensions of length).

Thanks in advance.

Sundar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The units of the metric tensor components ( and hence the Ricci tensor components) depend on the coordinate system. In the relation:
ds^2 = g_{\mu \nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu

ds^2 has units of length squared. In a Cartesian coordinate system, dx^2 has units of length squared, so the metric tensor components are dimensionless. However, in spherical coordinates, dr^2 has units of length squared, so grr is dimensionless, but dθ^2 is dimensionless so gθθ has units of length squared.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
936
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K