Direct proportionality equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    equations Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation x = vt + x_0 does not represent a direct proportionality between x and v due to the presence of the constant x_0. Instead, direct proportionality exists between (x - x_0) and t, as well as between (x - x_0) and v. Doubling v results in doubling (x - x_0) for a constant t, confirming this relationship. The graphical representation of this relationship is linear, but not directly proportional, as it does not pass through the origin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of direct proportionality
  • Basic knowledge of graphing linear relationships
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of direct proportionality in mathematical equations
  • Learn about linear relationships and their graphical representations
  • Study the implications of constants in linear equations
  • Explore the differences between direct proportionality and linearity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or mathematics, educators teaching linear equations, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of proportional relationships in equations.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1685668525439.png

Can a the equation ##x = vt + x_0## not be considered a direct proportionality between ##x## and ##v##? If so, is it because there is a constant ##x_0##?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this,
View attachment 327344
Can a the equation ##x = vt + x_0## not be considered a direct proportionality between ##x## and ##v##? If so, is it because there is a constant ##x_0##?

Many thanks!
The direct proportionality is between ##(x-x_0)## and ##t##. If you double ##v##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##t##.
You can also say that there is direct proportionality between ##(x-x_0)## and ##v##. If you double ##t##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##v##. Makes intuitive sense, no?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Steve4Physics, hmmm27 and member 731016
kuruman said:
The direct proportionality is between ##(x-x_0)## and ##t##. If you double ##v##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##t##.
You can also say that there is direct proportionality between ##(x-x_0)## and ##v##. If you double ##t##, you double ##(x-x_0)## for the same ##v##. Makes intuitive sense, no?
Thank you for your reply @kuruman! Yeah that is interesting, and yeah I think it makes sense :)

Many thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @kuruman! Yeah that is interesting, and yeah I think it makes sense :)
@kuruman's test (Post #3) for proportionality is straightforward. Ask yourself: 'If I double one quantity, does the other quantity always get doubled?'. If the answer is 'yes' the quantities are proportional.

Of course, there's nothing special about doubling. It works for any factor. E.g. if ##y## is proportional to ##x##, then tripling ##x## also triples ##y##. This should be clear if you thnk about the equation ##y=kx##.

It’s also worth thinking graphically. If two quantities are directly proportional, a graph of one quantity against the other is a straight line through the origin.

If you get a straight line which doesn't pass through the origin, the quantities are not proportional;. In this case, the relationship is called 'linearity'. E.g. for the equation ##x=vt + x_0## there are various ways to describe the relationship between ##x## and ##t##: e.g. '##x## is linearly dependent on ##t##'; or 'there is a linear releationship between ##x## and ##t##'.

Edit: typo' corrected.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes member 731016 and kuruman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
806
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K