MHB Discover the Game Champion: 115 Kids Tournament

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Kids
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wasntme)

I am looking at this exercise:

A board game can be played with $3,4,5 \text{ or } 6$ players.
There is a winner at each round of the game.
A group of $115$ children decides to organize a tournament of this game,for the emergence of the champion of the game,so that at each round participates the same number of children $n \in \{ 3,4,5,6\}$ and the total number of rounds that will be played is the minimum.Which must be $n$ and how many rounds will be played?I thought that $n$ must be $5$,because that is the only number of the possible $n$s that divides $115$,is it right?

And because of the fact that $115=5 \cdot 23$, $23$ rounds will be played.. Or am I wrong??

Could I solve the second subquestion,using graphs? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey! (Wasntme)

evinda said:
And because of the fact that $115=5 \cdot 23$, $23$ rounds will be played.. Or am I wrong??

That leaves you with 23 contestants.
How will they play to get 1 winner? (Thinking)
Could I solve the second subquestion,using graphs? :confused:

Sounds like a plan!

We must have 1 winner at the end.
If we play with $n=5$, we must have had $5$ players in the last round.
In the round before that, we might have had $25$ players... but we might also have $21$ players... (Thinking)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top