Uncovering the Truth: The Discovery of Light Mass and Its Effects | Red Colony

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lights Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent forum discussion centers on the misconception regarding the mass of photons, specifically addressing claims made by Kevin Reimund. It is established that photons do not possess proper mass but exhibit relativistic mass, a concept clarified by historical figures such as Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein. The confusion arises from the interpretation of radiation pressure, which has been understood for over a century. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between Newtonian particle theory and quantum mechanics in explaining the behavior of light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of relativistic mass
  • Knowledge of historical physics figures, specifically Poincaré and Einstein
  • Basic grasp of radiation pressure and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of relativistic mass in detail
  • Study Einstein's "photon in a box" thought experiment
  • Explore the historical context of light theories from Newton to modern quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the principles of radiation pressure and its applications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the historical evolution of light theories and their implications in modern physics.

Nim
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
From: http://www.redcolony.com/articles/030115.html

"Photon Reaction: Until recently, scientists believed that photons (light) had no mass, but recently, it was discovered that they did have mass. Light has mass. Light is reflected by reflective surfaces. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. That means that..."

Anyone know what "Kevin Reimund" is talking about?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i haven't read the link youve given but from the quote you gave i think he still believes in the theory of Newton that light is actually a snooker-like particles, and therefore have mass but according to quantum mechanics which replaced Newton's theory about particles this isn't the case.
 
Originally posted by Nim
From: http://www.redcolony.com/articles/030115.html

"Photon Reaction: Until recently, scientists believed that photons (light) had no mass, but recently, it was discovered that they did have mass. Light has mass. Light is reflected by reflective surfaces. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. That means that..."

Anyone know what "Kevin Reimund" is talking about?

The author is confusing relativistic mass with proper mass. He's speaking of radiation pressure and that was established by Poincare And Poisson over 100 years ago. The idea that electromagnetic radiation (i.e. light) had mass was first speculated by Poincare in 1900 as I recall. The issue was then raised again by Einstein in 1906 with his famous "photon in a box" experiment."

See http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/einsteins_box.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K