Discrete Model for Buckling Mode Shapes of a Clamped-Free Column

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the discrete modeling of buckling mode shapes for a clamped-free column, exploring the formulation of stiffness matrices and eigenvalue problems in the context of structural analysis. Participants are examining theoretical and practical aspects of modeling buckling behavior using finite element methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for the buckling shape of a clamped-free column and inquires about constructing a discrete model to obtain a buckling mode shape matrix.
  • Another participant asks how to separate translation and rotation modes within the context of the buckling analysis.
  • A different participant suggests performing a stress analysis for a unit applied load and formulating a geometric stiffness matrix for the stress distribution before conducting an eigensolution involving both elastic and geometric stiffness matrices.
  • This participant notes that if an eigenvector of the elastic stiffness matrix resembles the buckling mode, it may be coincidental.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying approaches to modeling buckling behavior, with no consensus reached on the best method to separate translation and rotation modes or on the overall modeling strategy.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the formulation of the stiffness matrices and the specific definitions of the buckling factor remain unspecified. The discussion also reflects a dependency on the finite element method literature for detailed setup guidance.

urocissa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
the buckling shape for clamped-free column is v(x)=1-cos(n*pi/2*L), n=1,3,5 ...

how could i use the discrete model to get the buckling mode shape matrix?

for example 3x3 matrix

form a stiffness matrix and solve the eigenvalue problem?

L=1;E=1;I=1

l=L/3 % 3-element beam

k=(E*I/l^3)*[24 0 -12 6*l 0 0;
0 8*l^2 -6*l 2*l^2 0 0;
-12 -6*l 24 0 -12 6*l;
6*l 2*l^2 0 8*l^2 -6*l 2*l^2 ;
0 0 -12 -6*l 12 -6*l ;
0 0 6*l 2*l^2 -6*l 4*l^2]

[v,d]=eig(k)

v =
0.0524 0.1142 0.0947 0.3177 -0.7286 0.5860
-0.3090 -0.6433 -0.5420 0.4409 -0.0323 -0.0386
0.1941 0.2589 0.0603 0.5004 -0.3124 -0.7373
-0.5357 -0.1915 0.7575 0.2857 0.1437 -0.0133
0.3924 0.1830 -0.0086 0.6031 0.5834 0.3290
-0.6505 0.6602 -0.3460 0.0941 0.0970 0.0550
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
how to separate the translation mode and rotation mode?
 
First you do a stress analysis for a unit applied load (i.e. the axial load on the column).

Then you formulate the geometric stiffness (or stress stiffness) matrix Kg for the stress distribution.

Then you do an eigensolution with the elastic stiffness Ke and Kg:

det(Ke + b Kg) = 0

where b is the "buckling factor", i.e. the scale factor from your unit load to the buckling load.

A textbook on the FE method will tell you how to set up Kg. (I had a quick look on the web but I couldn't find anything online)

If one of the eigenvectors of Ke is the same shape as the buckling mode, that is just a coincidence.
 
thank you~
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
10K