Distance=Planck Length * integer value?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether any distance can be expressed as a multiple of the Planck Length. It argues that the Planck Length is merely a unit of measurement that indicates a scale rather than implying quantization of space. Participants question the rationale behind assuming that all distances relate to the Planck Length in integer multiples. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of the implications of using the Planck Length in this context. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards skepticism regarding the quantization of distance based on the Planck Length.
Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Is it appropriate to say that Any Distance=Planck Length * integer value?
If not, why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Harmony said:
Is it appropriate to say that Any Distance=Planck Length * integer value?
If not, why is it so?
The PL is just a combination of units, used to suggest an order of magnitude. There is no reason to expect any quantization in terms of PL.
You have to ask: If so, why so?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K