B Planck Length 1 Detector? Emitter?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the theoretical implications of detecting and utilizing electromagnetic waves at the Planck length scale, particularly referred to as "Channel 1." Participants debate the feasibility of detecting gamma rays at this scale, the potential dangers of such emissions, and the synchronization of broadcasts across the universe. There is skepticism regarding the concept of a "shortest wavelength" for electromagnetic waves, emphasizing that wavelengths are continuous and not quantized. The conversation also touches on the limitations of current technology in emitting such high-energy waves and the need for clearer terminology in discussing these complex topics. Overall, the thread highlights the intersection of theoretical physics and practical communication challenges at extreme scales.
  • #31
If those critera are not met does black body radiation then cease to be the same as thermal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Sure, if the radiation is not in thermal equilibrium it's described by another state and thus you'll not measure a Planck spectrum.
 
  • #33
Silly Questions said:
does black body radiation then cease to be the same as thermal?
No, the radiation just ceases to be either thermal or black body (since "black body" and "thermal" mean the same thing for radiation).
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #34
So is there anything wrong with thinking that black body radiation, thermal radiation, and electrons changing energy levels are the same thing?

For the Planck length quantization to apply does the material radiating need to be in pure elemental form? I think I've been told in this thread that molecules have their own rules, but I wanted to make sure: quantization by Planck lengths only applies to the emissions from electrons changing energy levels within the energy shells of atoms, not the various hybrid orbitals of molecules?

Does this mean the inner walls of the black body apparatus need to be made out of elemental carbon? Black to absorb light and in element form to get the proper electron shells?
 
  • #35
Silly Questions said:
So is there anything wrong with thinking that black body radiation, thermal radiation, and electrons changing energy levels are the same thing?
Yes. Only the first two are the same thing. Electrons are not radiation. Also, individual electrons changing energy levels do not emit black body/thermal radiation.
 
  • #36
Can electrons change energy levels without emitting or absorbing a photon?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K