Planck Length 1 Detector? Emitter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of detecting and utilizing electromagnetic waves at the Planck length scale, specifically referred to as "Channel 1." Participants explore the feasibility of emitting and receiving signals at this scale, the potential dangers associated with such emissions, and the synchronization requirements for broadcasts. Key points include the assertion that electromagnetic waves are continuous and not quantized in a way that limits their wavelength, contradicting common misconceptions about the Planck length. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise terminology in discussing these advanced concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck units and their significance in physics
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic wave theory and quantum electrodynamics
  • Knowledge of the concept of quantization in physics
  • Basic grasp of the ultraviolet catastrophe and Planck's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Planck units in theoretical physics
  • Study quantum electrodynamics and its treatment of electromagnetic waves
  • Explore the concept of blackbody radiation and its relation to Planck's law
  • Investigate the synchronization of signals in quantum communication systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum theorists, and anyone interested in advanced electromagnetic theory and the implications of Planck scale phenomena.

  • #31
If those critera are not met does black body radiation then cease to be the same as thermal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Sure, if the radiation is not in thermal equilibrium it's described by another state and thus you'll not measure a Planck spectrum.
 
  • #33
Silly Questions said:
does black body radiation then cease to be the same as thermal?
No, the radiation just ceases to be either thermal or black body (since "black body" and "thermal" mean the same thing for radiation).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #34
So is there anything wrong with thinking that black body radiation, thermal radiation, and electrons changing energy levels are the same thing?

For the Planck length quantization to apply does the material radiating need to be in pure elemental form? I think I've been told in this thread that molecules have their own rules, but I wanted to make sure: quantization by Planck lengths only applies to the emissions from electrons changing energy levels within the energy shells of atoms, not the various hybrid orbitals of molecules?

Does this mean the inner walls of the black body apparatus need to be made out of elemental carbon? Black to absorb light and in element form to get the proper electron shells?
 
  • #35
Silly Questions said:
So is there anything wrong with thinking that black body radiation, thermal radiation, and electrons changing energy levels are the same thing?
Yes. Only the first two are the same thing. Electrons are not radiation. Also, individual electrons changing energy levels do not emit black body/thermal radiation.
 
  • #36
Can electrons change energy levels without emitting or absorbing a photon?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K