Distances with non-euclidean metric

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
when measuring length of geodesic shortest paths, or more in general, when measuring the length of a parametric curve in the space, what we usually do is to sum the length of infinitesimal arcs of that curve, assuming an euclidean norm.

Why this choice?
I have not found in literature any mention on the possibility of using other norms, like L1-norm.

Why not to allow to measure the length of infinitesimal arcs of a curve in [tex]\mathbb{R}^2[/tex] by doing instead:

[tex]ds = \left| \frac{\partial \mathbf{p}}{\partial x} \right| dx + \left| \frac{\partial \mathbf{p}}{\partial y} \right| dy[/tex]

Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We sum the lengths without any norm. We just sum numbers because of the natural assumption that the length of two pieces of a given path is the sum of the two lengths.

Here I am assuming that we are talking about the Riemannian and not pseudo-Riemannian case.

The other question is how to define the infinitesimal length. Here you have not only Riemannian but also more general Finsler geometries (see e.g. Chern and Shen, "Riemann-Finsler Geometry", World Scientific (2004)).