Do All Objects Have Intrinsic Spin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimgraber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
Click For Summary
Intrinsic spin is a fundamental property of particles, including elementary particles, composite particles, and atomic nuclei, but the discussion raises questions about whether larger objects also possess intrinsic spin beyond that of their constituent particles. While every object has electrons contributing to its overall spin, the concept of intrinsic spin may not apply meaningfully to large, interacting systems. The classification of all objects as either fermions or bosons holds true in isolation, but for larger entities, this classification becomes less relevant. The discussion highlights that while many particles have intrinsic spin, some, like the Higgs boson, have a spin of zero. Ultimately, the nature of intrinsic spin in larger objects remains complex and context-dependent.
jimgraber
Gold Member
Messages
247
Reaction score
18
What does and does not have intrinsic spin?
Wikipedia Spin (Physics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics )

says:
“In quantummechanicsand particlephysics, spinis an intrinsic form of angularmomentumcarried by elementaryparticles, composite particles (hadrons), and atomicnuclei.”But it doesn’t say that *only* those items have intrinsic spin. Is this list comprehensive? Or do other things have intrinsic spin? (as opposed to orbital angular momentum?) For example: molecules? Buckyballs?Ball Bearings? Schrodinger cats?Wikipedia Spin (Physics) goes on to say:

“Spin is one of two types of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, the other being orbital angular momentum. Orbital angularmomentumoperatoris the quantum-mechanical counterpart to the classical notion of angular momentum: it arises when a particle executes a rotating or twisting trajectory (such as when an electron orbits a nucleus).[3][4]The existence of spin angular momentum is inferred from experiments, such as the SternGerlachexperiment, in which particles are observed to possesses angular momentum that cannot be accounted for by orbital angular momentum alone.”Of course every large item has lots of electrons among other things and so it has spin due to the constituent electrons. I mean does the large object have any intrinsic spin of its own, beyond that inherited from its constituents.
Arguing the other way is

http://www.askamathematician.com/2011/10/q-what-is-spin-in-particle-physics-why-is-it-different-from-just-ordinary-rotation/

In its derivation that every three dimensional object is either a fermion or a boson, where it states:“By the way, notice that at no point has mass been mentioned! This result applies to anything and everything. Particles, groups of particles, your mom, whatevs!”Is everything either a fermion or a boson?

No matter how large?

And thus perhaps possesses its own intrinsic spin?

Or does this only apply to total angular momentum and not intrinsic spin.

I’m confused. Help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jimgraber said:
What does and does not have intrinsic spin?
Everything. Sometimes the value is zero. For elementary particle, the Higgs boson is the only (known) example with spin zero. Many mesons have spin zero, and in general bosons that are composed of multiple elementary particles can have spin zero (or at least: there exists a related state with spin zero, even if it has a different name).
jimgraber said:
Is everything either a fermion or a boson?
Yes, as long as you can consider the system in isolation. For large objects that constantly interact with the environment that classification becomes meaningless. The intrinsic spin becomes negligible in that case as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager, dlgoff and bhobba
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K