Do Bats Have an Evolutionary History Rooted in Myth or Science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Science
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
Gear300
Messages
1,212
Reaction score
10
From where I stand, human evolution from primates is more evidence-based and storied than our understanding of bats. Do we have an evolutionary understanding of bats? Or are their origins still more myth than science?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Did you find anything while searching for 'bat fossil'?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and BillTre
Rive said:
Did you find anything while searching for 'bat fossil'?
Found this article published in The Smithsonian. I'll give it a read.
 
Humans did not evolve from primates. Humans are part of the primate family (Hominidae). All members of the primate family evolved from a common ancestor.

Humans and bats - both mammals - also share a common ancestor. It doesn't mean one evolved from the other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara, pinball1970, russ_watters and 2 others
Gear300 said:
Do we have an evolutionary understanding of bats?
Do we have an evolutionary understanding of anything? Every organism has an incomplete family tree. Where do you draw the line between :"understanding" and "not understabding"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, russ_watters and BillTre
Gear300 said:
Do we have an evolutionary understanding of bats? Or are their origins still more myth than science?
Bats seem very fit for close combat where it outperforms say bows, a good step up from a fist, yet easy to manufacture, handle and maintain, compared to a sword that needs continous sharpening and a bit more skill to use. A good balance between simplicity, resources and function in the context of a low tech environment 😁

/Fredrik
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Gear300 and Tom.G