Do Black Holes and the Big Bang Singularity Reflect Maximum Entropy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kirovman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between black holes, maximum entropy, and the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang. It questions whether the Big Bang singularity can be considered an object of maximum entropy similar to black holes, highlighting that they are fundamentally different. Penrose's arguments suggest that our understanding of the Big Bang may need reevaluation due to the implications of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The conversation also notes that while the universe is not a black hole, it is possible to construct cosmologies resembling white holes. Ultimately, the entropy dynamics shift from inflationary dominance to gravitational dominance, complicating the entropy state of the universe.
kirovman
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question about Black Holes. I read that they are objects of maximum entropy for that particular region of space. So, does this apply to a singularity such as in the beginning of the Big Bang theory?
If the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang had maximum entropy, how does the universe exist as it does today?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
kirovman said:
Hi,
I have a question about Black Holes. I read that they are objects of maximum entropy for that particular region of space. So, does this apply to a singularity such as in the beginning of the Big Bang theory?
If the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang had maximum entropy, how does the universe exist as it does today?

Penrose has argued along these lines to point out that by virtue of the Second Law our understanding of the bigbang must be flawed.
I heard him give a talk which was largely about this, and he could not resolve the difficulty to his satisfaction.

However it is not true that a black hole singularity looks like
the big bang singularity.
they are very different.
a singularity is just a region where the theory breaks down, generates infinities, goes kaput.
a singularity can be pointlike (extending only in time) or it can be an unbounded 3D region extending to infinity spatially but with no duration in time.

I am not sure that one can make a good analogy between black hole singularity and big bang. MAYBE one can. But for me it is not clear enough so I cannot see how to apply the Second Law.

I hope you get some answers to your question because it is an interesting one. Good luck
 
marcus said:
I am not sure that one can make a good analogy between black hole singularity and big bang. MAYBE one can.
IIRC, hawking compared the two in his PhD thesis.. But I don't remember what results he came up with. :rolleyes:
 
It's not clear to me what the Schwartzschild radius of a supposed black-hole-like big bang singularity would be.
 
This comes up often enough to be a FAQ

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/BlackHoles/universe.html

The quick summary of the FAQ is that the universe is not a black hole, because the singularity is at the beginning of time. Not only is the universe not a black hole, there's no reasonable way to make it a black hole, because the singularity is at the wrong time.

The standard cosmologies don't have the universe as a white hole (time reversed black hole) either, but it turns out to be possible to construct such a cosmology. It turns out that a white hole under certain conditions can be indistinguiishable from the standard FRW cosmologies for a long time (though not forever).
 
kirovman said:
Hi,
I have a question about Black Holes. I read that they are objects of maximum entropy for that particular region of space. So, does this apply to a singularity such as in the beginning of the Big Bang theory?
If the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang had maximum entropy, how does the universe exist as it does today?

The answer to your question may be as follows :

The entropy at the end of the period of inflation was maximal for a universe in which gravity is not the dominant force (inflation was the dominant force up to then) - ie a homogeneous universe of mass-energy. But as inflation ended, gravity became dominant and a homogeneous universe of mass-energy is no longer the maximal entropy state in a gravity-dominated universe.

See also the thread on Weyl Curvature Hypothesis & Entropy : https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=48076&page=2&pp=15
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
248
Back
Top