Do Manual or Automatic Transmissions Offer Better Traction in Snow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wannabeagenius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Automobile
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between manual and automatic transmissions in terms of their effectiveness for providing traction in snowy conditions. Participants explore various aspects of how each transmission type may influence vehicle control and power delivery in slippery environments.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the sensation of better traction with manual transmissions may be real, potentially linked to different gearing or control over engine RPM.
  • Others argue that the lockup of a clutch plate in manuals differs significantly from the hydraulic action of a torque converter in automatics, especially at low speeds.
  • One participant notes that an automatic transmission can unlock the torque converter at low speeds, which may lead to more power being applied to the ground, affecting traction.
  • Another viewpoint highlights that a fluid clutch in automatics acts as a torque multiplier, while a manual clutch may limit torque due to slipping, which could influence traction dynamics.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of managing power application on slippery surfaces, suggesting that automatics may allow for better metering of power compared to manuals.
  • Concerns are raised about the risk of spinning wheels and digging into snow when too much power is applied, with some advocating for a gentler throttle control that manual transmissions may facilitate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of manual versus automatic transmissions in snow, with no consensus reached on which provides better traction. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various driving experiences and theoretical considerations without resolving the underlying assumptions about traction dynamics and power delivery in snow.

Wannabeagenius
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Something has been nagging at me for decades and I feel that this is the place to get the real answer so here goes.

The question concerns the difference between manual transmissions and automatic transmissions regarding traction in snow.

Now it seems to me that given the same input/output gearing and the same number of gears, it would not matter if the transmission were automatic, manual, or powered by several very intelligent mighty mice. The torque at each gear delivered to the wheels would be the same in all cases.

Now anybody, including myself, who has driven a manual transmission knows that there is a sensation of more traction in snow. Is this sensation real or imaginary? If imaginary, why? If real, is it simply a matter of different gearing? If it is real and it is not a matter of different gearing, what in the world is the physics behind it?

Thanks in advance.

Bob
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wannabeagenius said:
Hi All,

Something has been nagging at me for decades and I feel that this is the place to get the real answer so here goes.

The question concerns the difference between manual transmissions and automatic transmissions regarding traction in snow.

Now it seems to me that given the same input/output gearing and the same number of gears, it would not matter if the transmission were automatic, manual, or powered by several very intelligent mighty mice. The torque at each gear delivered to the wheels would be the same in all cases.

Now anybody, including myself, who has driven a manual transmission knows that there is a sensation of more traction in snow. Is this sensation real or imaginary? If imaginary, why? If real, is it simply a matter of different gearing? If it is real and it is not a matter of different gearing, what in the world is the physics behind it?

Thanks in advance.

Bob

I think you will find the lockup of a clutch plate to flywheel, is quite a bit different than the forces moving through the hydraulic action of a torque converter, especially at slower speeds.
 
It's probably because an automatic at low speeds unlocks the torque converter. So that paired with the fact that the engine's speed can increase when torque converter is unlocked will lead to more power being applied to the ground with a given throttle input. The available traction is the same, but the power/torque transferred to the ground isn't.
 
A fluid clutch in most automatics acts as a torque multiplier because of the layout of inner driven and outer driving vanes, minus the losses. A manual clutch acts as a torque limiter, converting some of the engine's energy into heat energy as the manual clutch slips.
 
Wannabeagenius said:
Hi All,
...Now anybody, including myself, who has driven a manual transmission knows that there is a sensation of more traction in snow. Is this sensation real or imaginary? If imaginary, why? If real, is it simply a matter of different gearing? If it is real and it is not a matter of different gearing, what in the world is the physics behind it?
Bob

Having never driven a manual in the snow, I would have to take your word for it--the apparent control, that is. An automatic selects the gears for you. With a manual, you have control over what RMP you wish to run. Just off hand, I think that running at a somewhat higher rpm than normal would give you better control, where the gas peddle can supply braking. I think I'd be asking those who race cars If a manual transmission provides better traction control, and why they think so.
 
Last edited:
driving in snow

I'm a bit surprised at you guys. What is the most apparent thing about snow? Hint: not the fact that it's white. Right, the fact that it's slippery. You don't want to apply power to a substance that will go from static to dynamic friction at the drop of a hat. You want all the wheels (this includes the wheels that steer) to keep rolling nicely along and delivering the smallest forces or they will break traction and you will lose controll. What's this talk about needing power..Oh, I can see if the roads aren't plowed yet and you're pushing snow with your front bumper...In that case you shouldn't be driving.
The automatic is the clear winner because you can meter out the power and not worry about taking the clutch up too fast. Case Closed.
 
Last edited:
mtworkowski@o said:
I'm a bit surprised at you guys.
I'm suprised you didn't read my post.
 
I have read your post. Please explain why you would prefer higher RPM and engine braking. I think you may be mistaken...or not. Remember the question was about snow, the white stuff that makes you slide around and damage your car...
 
Last edited:
Did you ever get your car stuck on a snowy surface in a rut. If you use the gas you spin the wheel and dig in deeper. Now we know that shifting back a forth from D to R and rocking the car will get you right out. But you can sometimes climb out by just creeping along up and out. This repuires a soft touch on the throttle. When I'm driving a stick shift, I have the gas and clutch to meter out and I can't really feel when I'm delivering too much power. Static friction is how much stronger than dynamic friction? I forgot I learned it in high school over 40 years ago.
 

Similar threads

Automotive How do Center differentials work
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K