do we have any proof of entanglement other than Bells Inequalities?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

bell's inequalities says that:

- no physical theory of local hidden variables can reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics

or in other words

- the correlations in/during Quantum Entanglement (QE) are stronger than could be explained by local hidden variables

even Bell's inequalities are not totally conclusive

is there any other experiment/observation/theoretical-mathematical deduction that would show/prove, or even hint, the existence of QE?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Do we have any proof of entanglement other than bells inequalities?

Loading...

Similar Threads for proof entanglement bells |
---|

A Does the Frauchiger-Renner Theorem prove only MWI is correct |

I Do macro objects get entangled? |

B Library of Babel quantum state |

I A Proof of Kaku (8.18). |

I Representations of the Poincaré group: question in a proof |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**